Photogrammetry-derived digital surface model and orthoimagery of the Usibelli Group type section, Suntrana Creek, Alaska

Metadata also available as - [Parseable text] - [XML]

Frequently anticipated questions:


What does this data set describe?

Title:
Photogrammetry-derived digital surface model and orthoimagery of the Usibelli Group type section, Suntrana Creek, Alaska
Abstract:
The Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys (DGGS) conducted a photogrammetric survey in the Suntrana Creek area near Healy, Alaska. This survey includes most of the type section for the Cenozoic Usibelli Group, an economically significant coal-bearing succession. Aerial photographs and Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) data were collected on May 10, 2018. We processed these data using structure-from-motion (SfM) photogrammetric techniques to create a digital surface model (DSM) and orthoimage of the surveyed area. Data files available for download are tiled DSM and natural color (RGB) orthoimage GeoTIFFs. This Raw Data File provides open access to, and an open end-user license for, these data products. All files can be downloaded free of charge from the DGGS website (<http://doi.org/10.14509/30425>).
Supplemental_Information:
digital surface model: DSMs represent elevations of all surfaces, including vegetation, vegetation-free land, bridges, buildings, etc. The DSM is a single-band, 32-bit float GeoTIFF file, with a GSD of 2.5 cm. The "No Data" value is set to -9999. 
orthoimage: The orthoimage is a four-band, 16-bit unsigned GeoTIFF file, with a GSD of 2.5 cm. The "No Data" value is set to 256.
  1. How should this data set be cited?

    Herriott, T.M., Wikstrom Jones, Katreen, Wolken, G.J., and Willingham, A.L., 2020, Photogrammetry-derived digital surface model and orthoimagery of the Usibelli Group type section, Suntrana Creek, Alaska: Raw Data File RDF 2020-2, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 5 p.

  2. What geographic area does the data set cover?

    West_Bounding_Coordinate: -148.862471
    East_Bounding_Coordinate: -148.843359
    North_Bounding_Coordinate: 63.864079
    South_Bounding_Coordinate: 63.853477

  3. What does it look like?

  4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?

    Calendar_Date: 2018
    Currentness_Reference: ground condition

  5. What is the general form of this data set?

    Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: imagery

  6. How does the data set represent geographic features?

    1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?

      This is a raster data set.

    2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?

      Grid_Coordinate_System_Name: Universal Transverse Mercator
      Universal_Transverse_Mercator:
      UTM_Zone_Number: 6
      Transverse_Mercator:
      Scale_Factor_at_Central_Meridian: 0.999600
      Longitude_of_Central_Meridian: -147
      Latitude_of_Projection_Origin: 0
      False_Easting: 500000.000000
      False_Northing: 0

      Planar coordinates are encoded using coordinate pair
      Abscissae (x-coordinates) are specified to the nearest .00000001
      Ordinates (y-coordinates) are specified to the nearest .00000001
      Planar coordinates are specified in Meters

      The horizontal datum used is North American Datum of 1983.
      The ellipsoid used is GRS 80.
      The semi-major axis of the ellipsoid used is 6378137.
      The flattening of the ellipsoid used is 1/298.257222101000025.

      Vertical_Coordinate_System_Definition:
      Altitude_System_Definition:
      Altitude_Datum_Name: NAVD88 (Geoid12A; EPOCH 2010.00)
      Altitude_Resolution: 2.5
      Altitude_Distance_Units: centimeters
      Altitude_Encoding_Method:
      Explicit elevation coordinate included with horizontal coordinates

  7. How does the data set describe geographic features?

    digital surface model
    DSMs represent elevations of all surfaces, including vegetation, vegetation-free land, bridges, buildings, etc. The DSM is a single-band, 32-bit float GeoTIFF file, with a GSD of 2.5 cm. The "No Data" value is set to -9999. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys (DGGS))

    orthoimage
    The orthoimage is a four-band, 16-bit unsigned GeoTIFF file, with a GSD of 2.5 cm. The "No Data" value is set to 256. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys (DGGS))


Who produced the data set?

  1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)

  2. Who also contributed to the data set?

    The State of Alaska funded this work. We thank helicopter pilot Alex Shapiro (Alaska Land Exploration) for precise flying during the Suntrana Creek photogrammetric survey. Michelle Gavel assisted with image masking. Discussions with Marwan Wartes and Dave LePain regarding the Usibelli Group stratigraphy are much appreciated. Additional support in data handling and digital products was provided by Andrew Herbst, Mike Hendricks, Kristen Janssen, and Simone Montayne.

  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?

    Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys
    Metadata Manager
    3354 College Road
    Fairbanks, AK 99709-3707
    USA

    (907)451-5020 (voice)
    (907)451-5050 (FAX)
    dggspubs@alaska.gov

    Hours_of_Service: 8 am to 4:30 pm, Monday through Friday, except State holidays


Why was the data set created?

The goal of this data release is to provide a visual and quantitative context for the stratigraphy Cenozoic Usibelli Group in support of geologic and and economic studies.


How was the data set created?

  1. From what previous works were the data drawn?

  2. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?

    Date: 2018 (process 1 of 3)
    Aircraft and equipment - Aerial photography was conducted from a Robinson R44 helicopter at an above-ground-level flying height of approximately 100 m. We employed a Nikon D850 digital single-lens reflex camera with a Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 24mm f/1.8G ED lens. The design ground sample distance (GSD) is 1.8 cm. Each photograph is 45.4-megapixels (8256 x 5504 pixels); images were recorded in a 14-bit, losslessly compressed NEF (RAW) file format. Twenty-one north-south-trending, near-nadir-view flight lines were flown with approximately 60 percent side-lap (that is to say, frame overlap between adjacent flight lines); sequential frames were collected to yield at least 75 percent end-lap. Two additional east-west-trending, near-nadir-view flight lines, as well as two oblique-view flight lines of the Suntrana Creek valley walls, were also flown, further bolstering the photographic dataset and ensuring convergent imagery geometries in a critical part of the survey area. The dataset ultimately comprised 568 photographs (see below), and the total area surveyed is approximately 1 km2.

    Date: 2018 (process 2 of 3)
    Georeferencing - Fourteen GNSS points were collected as real-time kinematic occupations with a Trimble R8 GNSS receiver; 10 of these points were employed as ground control points and four were designated as checkpoints, as described below (fig. 2). A Trimble R7 GNSS receiver with Zephyr-2 antenna was deployed as a base station near the road at the mouth of Suntrana Creek and used as horizontal and vertical control for real-time kinematic baseline adjustments. The Trimble R7 Zephyr-2 base station position was corrected using the NGS Online Positioning User Service (OPUS) with the IGS08 (EPOCH:2018.3559). Real-time kinematic baselines of ground control points and checkpoints were differentially adjusted with the corrected base station coordinates using Trimble Business Center processing software.

    Date: 2018 (process 3 of 3)
    Photography - The NEF format aerial photographs were imported into Adobe Photoshop Lightroom, optimized for consistent white balance and exposure parameters, and exported as high-quality JPEG files. The 568 photographs selected for SfM processing were imported into Agisoft Photoscan Professional software (Version 1.2.3 build 2331) on a Windows desktop computer. Prior to alignment, image masks were developed as necessary and the photographs were georeferenced using 10 of the GNSS points (fig. 2). The photographs were processed in Photoscan to edit the sparse point cloud, optimize the bundle block adjustment, construct the dense point cloud and triangulated irregular network geometry, and export the natural color (RGB) orthoimagery GeoTIFF file.

  3. What similar or related data should the user be aware of?

    Wartes, M.A., Gillis, R.J., Herriott, T.M., Stanley, R.G., Helmold, K.P., Peterson, C.S., and Benowitz, J.A., 2013, Summary of 2012 reconnaissance field studies related to the petroleum geology of the Nenana basin, interior Alaska: Preliminary Interpretive Report PIR 2013-2, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 13 p


How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?

  1. How well have the observations been checked?

    The DSM and orthoimagery were visually inspected for data errors such as pits, border artifacts, and shifting.

  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?

    Fourteen GNSS points were collected as real-time kinematic occupations with a Trimble R8 GNSS receiver; 10 of these points were employed as ground control points and four were designated as checkpoints. A Trimble R7 GNSS receiver with Zephyr-2 antenna was deployed as a base station near the road at the mouth of Suntrana Creek and used as horizontal and vertical control for real-time kinematic baseline adjustments. The Trimble R7 Zephyr-2 base station position was corrected using the NGS Online Positioning User Service (OPUS) with the IGS08 (EPOCH:2018.3559). Real-time kinematic baselines of ground control points and checkpoints were differentially adjusted with the corrected base station coordinates using Trimble Business Center processing software. Four of the GCPs were designated as checkpoints to assess horizontal accuracy of the data products by comparing these four GNSS-derived points with their locations on the orthoimage. The mean offsets (residual) are -0.0190 m in the X-direction and 0.0197 m in the Y-direction, with standard deviations of 0.0311 m (X-direction) and 0.0512 m (Y-direction) and mean absolute errors of 0.0275 m (X-direction) and 0.0379 m (Y-direction). No horizontal transformation is applied because the horizontal mean offsets are less than the DSM's scale of 2.5 cm per pixel. A table of checkpoints and errors is provided in the accompanying report.

  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?

    Vertical accuracy of the DSM is evaluated by comparing the elevation values of the same four checkpoints in the photogrammetry-derived DSM to the GNSS-derived elevation values. The mean vertical offset (Z-direction) is -0.0209 m, with a standard deviation of 0.0379 and mean absolute error of 0.0320 cm (table 1). No vertical transformation is applied. A table of checkpoints and errors is provided in the accompanying report.

  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?

    The design ground sample distance (GSD) is 1.8 cm. Each photograph is 45.4-megapixels (8256 x 5504 pixels); images were recorded in a 14-bit, losslessly compressed NEF (RAW) file format. Twenty-one north-south-trending, near-nadir-view flight lines were flown with approximately 60 percent side-lap (that is to say, frame overlap between adjacent flight lines); sequential frames were collected to yield at least 75 percent end-lap. Two additional east-west-trending, near-nadir-view flight lines, as well as two oblique-view flight lines of the Suntrana Creek valley walls, were also flown, further bolstering the photographic dataset and ensuring convergent imagery geometries in a critical part of the survey area. The dataset ultimately comprised 568 photographs (see below), and the total area surveyed is approximately 1 km2.This data release is complete.

  5. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?

    A Trimble R7 GNSS receiver with Zephyr-2 antenna was deployed as a base station near the road at the mouth of Suntrana Creek and used as horizontal and vertical control for real-time kinematic baseline adjustments. The Trimble R7 Zephyr-2 base station position was corrected using the NGS Online Positioning User Service (OPUS) with the IGS08 (EPOCH:2018.3559). Real-time kinematic baselines of ground control points and checkpoints were differentially adjusted with the corrected base station coordinates using Trimble Business Center processing software. Four of the GCPs were designated as checkpoints to assess horizontal accuracy of the data products by comparing these four GNSS-derived points with their locations on the orthoimage.


How can someone get a copy of the data set?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?

Access_Constraints:
This report, map, and/or dataset is available directly from the State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys (see contact information below).
Use_Constraints:
Any hard copies or published datasets utilizing these datasets shall clearly indicate their source. If the user has modified the data in any way, the user is obligated to describe the types of modifications the user has made. The user specifically agrees not to misrepresent these datasets, nor to imply that changes made by the user were approved by the State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys. The State of Alaska makes no express or implied warranties (including warranties for merchantability and fitness) with respect to the character, functions, or capabilities of the electronic data or products or their appropriateness for any user's purposes. In no event will the State of Alaska be liable for any incidental, indirect, special, consequential, or other damages suffered by the user or any other person or entity whether from the use of the electronic services or products or any failure thereof or otherwise. In no event will the State of Alaska's liability to the Requestor or anyone else exceed the fee paid for the electronic service or product.

  1. Who distributes the data set? (Distributor 1 of 1)

    Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys
    Metadata Manager
    3354 College Road
    Fairbanks, AK 99709-3707
    USA

    (907)451-5020 (voice)
    (907)451-5050 (FAX)
    dggspubs@alaska.gov

    Hours_of_Service: 8 am to 4:30 pm, Monday through Friday, except State holidays
  2. What's the catalog number I need to order this data set?

    RDF 2020-2

  3. What legal disclaimers am I supposed to read?

    The State of Alaska makes no expressed or implied warranties (including warranties for merchantability and fitness) with respect to the character, functions, or capabilities of the electronic data or products or their appropriateness for any user's purposes. In no event will the State of Alaska be liable for any incidental, indirect, special, consequential, or other damages suffered by the user or any other person or entity whether from the use of the electronic services or products or any failure thereof or otherwise. In no event will the State of Alaska's liability to the Requestor or anyone else exceed the fee paid for the electronic service or product.

  4. How can I download or order the data?


Who wrote the metadata?

Dates:
Last modified: 16-Mar-2020
Metadata author:
Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys
Attn: Simone Montayne
Metadata Manager
3354 College Road
Fairbanks, AK 99709-3707
USA

(907)451-5020 (voice)
(907)451-5050 (FAX)
dggspubs@alaska.gov

Hours_of_Service: 8 am to 4:30 pm, Monday through Friday, except State holidays
Metadata standard:
FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (FGDC-STD-001-1998)
Metadata extensions used:


Generated by mp version 2.9.21 on Mon Mar 16 12:44:00 2020