High-resolution lidar data for Pilgrim Hot Springs, western Alaska, collected August 15, 2019

Metadata also available as - [Parseable text] - [XML]

Frequently anticipated questions:


What does this data set describe?

Title:
High-resolution lidar data for Pilgrim Hot Springs, western Alaska, collected August 15, 2019
Abstract:
The State of Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys (DGGS) produced airborne lidar-derived elevation data for the Pilgrim Hot Springs area, western Alaska. Both aerial lidar and ground control data were collected by DGGS. This data collection is being released as a Raw Data File with an open end-user license. These data were produced in support of active fault detection and geothermal hydrology research in the area. This data collection is being released as a Raw Data File with an open end-user license. All files can be downloaded free of charge from the Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys website (http://doi.org/10.14509/30659).
Supplemental_Information:
classified point cloud data:    Classified point cloud data are provided in this collection in compressed LAZ format. Data are classified in accordance with ASPRS 2014 guidelines and contain return and intensity information. The average point spacing was 27 cm and the average density was 13.92 pts/m2. Elevation surfaces interpolated from areas with a point density of fewer than 4pts/m2 were classified as NoData.	
digital surface model:    The DSM represents surface elevations as they appear to the naked eye, including the heights of vegetation, buildings, bridges, etc. The DSM is a single band, 32-bit GeoTIFF file, with a ground sample distance of 0.5 meters. No Data value is set to -3.40282306074e+038.	
digital terrain model:    The DTM represents surface elevations of ground surfaces, excluding vegetation, bridges, buildings, etc. The DTM is a single-band, 32-bit float GeoTIFF file, with a ground sample distance of 1 meters. NoData value is set to -3.40282306074e+038.	
lidar intensity image:    The lidar intensity image describes the relative amplitude of reflected signals contributing to the point cloud. Lidar intensity is largely a function of scanned object reflectance in relation to the signal frequency, is dependent on ambient conditions, and is not necessarily consistent between separate scans. The intensity image is a single-band, 32-bit float GeoTIFF file with a ground sample distance of 1 meter. NoData value is set to -3.40282306074e+038.
  1. How might this data set be cited?
    Herbst, A.M., and Daanen, R.P., 2021, High-resolution lidar data for Pilgrim Hot Springs, western Alaska, collected August 15, 2019: Raw Data File RDF 2021-7, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 6 p.
  2. What geographic area does the data set cover?
    West_Bounding_Coordinate: -165.128842
    East_Bounding_Coordinate: -164.773483
    North_Bounding_Coordinate: 65.146086
    South_Bounding_Coordinate: 65.011882
  3. What does it look like?
  4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?
    Calendar_Date: 15-Aug-2019
    Currentness_Reference:
    ground condition
  5. What is the general form of this data set?
    Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: GeoTIFF
  6. How does the data set represent geographic features?
    1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?
      This is a raster data set.
    2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?
      Grid_Coordinate_System_Name: Universal Transverse Mercator
      Universal_Transverse_Mercator:
      UTM_Zone_Number: 3
      Transverse_Mercator:
      Scale_Factor_at_Central_Meridian: 0.999600
      Longitude_of_Central_Meridian: -165
      Latitude_of_Projection_Origin: 0
      False_Easting: 500000.000000
      False_Northing: 0
      Planar coordinates are encoded using coordinate pair
      Abscissae (x-coordinates) are specified to the nearest .00000001
      Ordinates (y-coordinates) are specified to the nearest .00000001
      Planar coordinates are specified in Meters
      The horizontal datum used is NAD83 (2011).
      The ellipsoid used is GRS 80.
      The semi-major axis of the ellipsoid used is 6378137.
      The flattening of the ellipsoid used is 1/298.257222101000025.
      Vertical_Coordinate_System_Definition:
      Altitude_System_Definition:
      Altitude_Datum_Name: NAVD88, GEOID12B
      Altitude_Resolution: 0.001
      Altitude_Distance_Units: meters
      Altitude_Encoding_Method:
      Explicit elevation coordinate included with horizontal coordinates
  7. How does the data set describe geographic features?
    classified point cloud data
    Classified point cloud data are provided in this collection in compressed LAZ format. Data are classified in accordance with ASPRS 2014 guidelines and contain return and intensity information. The average point spacing was 27 cm and the average density was 13.92 pts/m2. Elevation surfaces interpolated from areas with a point density of fewer than 4pts/m2 were classified as NoData. (Source: DGGS)
    digital surface model
    The DSM represents surface elevations as they appear to the naked eye, including the heights of vegetation, buildings, bridges, etc. The DSM is a single band, 32-bit GeoTIFF file, with a ground sample distance of 0.5 meters. No Data value is set to -3.40282306074e+038. (Source: DGGS)
    digital terrain model
    The DTM represents surface elevations of ground surfaces, excluding vegetation, bridges, buildings, etc. The DTM is a single-band, 32-bit float GeoTIFF file, with a ground sample distance of 1 meters. NoData value is set to -3.40282306074e+038. (Source: DGGS)
    lidar intensity image
    The lidar intensity image describes the relative amplitude of reflected signals contributing to the point cloud. Lidar intensity is largely a function of scanned object reflectance in relation to the signal frequency, is dependent on ambient conditions, and is not necessarily consistent between separate scans. The intensity image is a single-band, 32-bit float GeoTIFF file with a ground sample distance of 1 meter. NoData value is set to -3.40282306074e+038. (Source: DGGS)

Who produced the data set?

  1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)
  2. Who also contributed to the data set?
    These data were paid for by the State of Alaska and collected and processed by DGGS.
  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?
    Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys
    Metadata Manager
    3354 College Road
    Fairbanks, AK
    USA

    (907)451-5020 (voice)
    (907)451-5050 (FAX)
    dggspubs@alaska.gov
    Hours_of_Service: 8 am to 4:30 pm, Monday through Friday, except State holidays
    Contact_Instructions:
    Please view our website (https://www.dggs.alaska.gov) for the latest information on available data. Please contact us using the e-mail address provided above when possible.

Why was the data set created?

These data were produced in support of active fault detection and geothermal hydrology research in the area.

How was the data set created?

  1. From what previous works were the data drawn?
  2. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?
    Date: 15-Aug-2019 (process 1 of 3)
    Airborne survey - The airborne survey occurred on August 15, 2019. The weather was clear throughout the survey. This dataset includes point cloud data, a digital terrain model (DTM), and a digital surface model (DSM) covering Pilgrim Hot Springs, western Alaska (approximately 47 mi2). This survey was conducted with a DGGS-operated Riegl VUX1-LR lidar system with an integrated Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receiver and Northrop Grumman inertial measurement unit (IMU) system. The integration was designed by Phoenix LiDAR systems. This survey was flown with a pulse rate between 200,000 and 400,000 pulses/second, at a scan rate between 80 and 150 scans/second. This survey was flown with an average elevation of 400 m above ground level and a ground speed of approximately 40 m/s with a fixed-wing aircraft configuration, using a Cessna 185 aircraft. The scan angle was set from 55 to 305 degrees, centered normal to the bottom of the aircraft.
    Date: 15-Aug-2019 (process 2 of 3)
    Ground survey - Trimble R8 and R9 real-time kinematic GNSS systems were used to collect 62 combined checkpoints and control points for the project. Points were adjusted for accuracy according to Online Positioning User Service (OPUS) corrections in Trimble Business Center.
    Date: 2020 (process 3 of 3)
    Lidar dataset processing - Point data were processed in SDCimport software for initial filtering and multiple-time-around (MTA) disambiguation. MTA errors, corrected in this process, are the result of imprecise interpretations of received pulse time intervals and occur more frequently with higher pulse refresh rates. IMU and GPS data were used to integrate flightline information with the point cloud in Spatial Explorer software. The point data were calibrated at an incrementally precise scale of sensor movement and behavior, incorporating sensor velocity, roll, pitch, and yaw fluctuations throughout the survey. Points were classified in accordance with the American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ASPRS) 2014 guidelines, using macros designed in Terrasolid software. Careful attention was given to the interpolation of the project's ground surface to compensate for inconsistent penetration through low vegetation as a function of the scan angle. Once classified, points underwent a geometric transformation and were converted from ellipsoidal heights to GEOID12B (Alaska) heights. Raster products were derived from the point cloud using ArcMap. The DTM was interpolated from all ground class returns using a mean binning method. The DSM was likewise interpolated from only the first returns for all classes. An intensity image was produced in ArcMap using mean binning.
  3. What similar or related data should the user be aware of?
    Emond, A.M., and Daanen, R.P., 2020, Pilgrim Hot Springs CSAMT measurements, Seward Peninsula, Alaska: Raw Data File RDF 2020-9, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 5 p
    Herbst, A.M., and Daanen, R.P., 2021, High-resolution lidar data for Pilgrim Hot Springs, western Alaska, collected August 15, 2019: Raw Data File RDF 2021-7, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 6 p

How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?

  1. How well have the observations been checked?
    Not applicable
  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?
    Horizontal accuracy was not measured for this collection.
  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?
    Thirty-one ground control points were used to determine a 0.11 m average offset from the point cloud, which was corrected with a uniform z-transformation of the lidar data. Point cloud accuracy was measured using 31 checkpoints to determine a root-mean-square error of 0.087 m for the project. Relative accuracy for this dataset has been evaluated as the interswath consistency, measured by comparing tie line points within swath overlap areas. The interswath root-mean-square error was calculated to be 0.008 meters.
  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?
    This data release is complete.
  5. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?
    The accompanying report provides tabulated checkpoints and a comprehensive discussion of the tests and processing methods used to ensure data consistency. In addition to accuracy calculations, the imagery was visually inspected for data errors such as pits, border artifacts, and shifting.

How can someone get a copy of the data set?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?
Access_Constraints:
This report, map, and/or dataset is available directly from the State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys (see contact information below).
Use_Constraints:
Any hard copies or published datasets utilizing these datasets shall clearly indicate their source. If the user has modified the data in any way, the user is obligated to describe the types of modifications the user has made. The user specifically agrees not to misrepresent these datasets, nor to imply that changes made by the user were approved by the State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys. The State of Alaska makes no express or implied warranties (including warranties for merchantability and fitness) with respect to the character, functions, or capabilities of the electronic data or products or their appropriateness for any user's purposes. In no event will the State of Alaska be liable for any incidental, indirect, special, consequential, or other damages suffered by the user or any other person or entity whether from the use of the electronic services or products or any failure thereof or otherwise. In no event will the State of Alaska's liability to the Requestor or anyone else exceed the fee paid for the electronic service or product.
  1. Who distributes the data set? (Distributor 1 of 1)
    Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys
    Metadata Manager
    3354 College Road
    Fairbanks, AK
    USA

    (907)451-5020 (voice)
    (907)451-5050 (FAX)
    dggspubs@alaska.gov
    Hours_of_Service: 8 am to 4:30 pm, Monday through Friday, except State holidays
    Contact_Instructions:
    Please view our website (https://www.dggs.alaska.gov) for the latest information on available data. Please contact us using the e-mail address provided above when possible.
  2. What's the catalog number I need to order this data set? RDF 2021-7
  3. What legal disclaimers am I supposed to read?
    The State of Alaska makes no expressed or implied warranties (including warranties for merchantability and fitness) with respect to the character, functions, or capabilities of the electronic data or products or their appropriateness for any user's purposes. In no event will the State of Alaska be liable for any incidental, indirect, special, consequential, or other damages suffered by the user or any other person or entity whether from the use of the electronic services or products or any failure thereof or otherwise. In no event will the State of Alaska's liability to the Requestor or anyone else exceed the fee paid for the electronic service or product.
  4. How can I download or order the data?

Who wrote the metadata?

Dates:
Last modified: 11-Jun-2021
Metadata author:
Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys
Attn: Simone Montayne
Metadata Manager
3354 College Road
Fairbanks, AK
USA

(907)451-5020 (voice)
(907)451-5050 (FAX)
dggspubs@alaska.gov
Hours_of_Service: 8 am to 4:30 pm, Monday through Friday, except State holidays
Metadata standard:
FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (FGDC-STD-001-1998)
Metadata extensions used:

Generated by mp version 2.9.50 on Fri Jun 11 13:37:46 2021