Tsunami inundation maps of Cordova and Tatitlek, Alaska

Metadata also available as - [Parseable text] - [XML]

Frequently anticipated questions:


What does this data set describe?

Title: Tsunami inundation maps of Cordova and Tatitlek, Alaska
Abstract:
The purpose of this study is to evaluate potential tsunami hazards for the Prince William Sound communities of Cordova and Tatitlek. We numerically model the extent of inundation from tsunami waves generated by earthquake sources and consider the results in light of historical observations. Tsunami scenarios include a repeat of the tsunami triggered by the 1964 Great Alaska Earthquake as well as tsunami waves generated by the following hypothetical scenarios: An extended 1964 rupture, a Cascadia megathrust earthquake, various earthquakes in Prince William Sound, and a Tohoku-type earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region. Results of our numerical modeling, combined with historical observations, are designed to provide guidance to local emergency management agencies in tsunami hazard assessment, evacuation planning, and public education to mitigate damage from future tsunami hazards.
Supplemental_Information:
The DGGS metadata standard extends the FGDC standard to include elements that are required to facilitate our internal data management. These elements, referred to as "layers," group and describe files that have intrinsic logical or topological relationships and correspond to subdirectories within the data distribution package. The metadata layer provides an FGDC metadata file and may include other documentation files. Attribute information for each data layer is described in this metadata file under the "Entity_and_Attribute_Information" section. Data layer contents:
border:    Outline of the study area.
maximum-inundation-line:    Shapefiles which display the estimated, "maximum credible scenario" inundation extent for the communities of Cordova and Tatitlek. These lines are based on model simulation of all credible source scenarios and historical observations. The "maximum credible scenario" inundation lines are intended to be used as a basis for local tsunami hazard planning and development of evacuation maps.
max-flow-depth:    Raster image depicting maximum composite flow depths over dry land. Pixel values provide the modeled depth (in meters) of maximum inundation. For each grid point, the pixel value provides the modeled depth of water (in meters) over previously dry land, representing the maximum depth value of all calculated tsunami scenarios.
time-series-points:    To help emergency management personnel assess tsunami hazards in Cordova and Tatitlek, we supplement the inundation maps with the time series plots of the modeled water level and velocity dynamics at some on-land and some offshore locations in the communities. The plots are provided in the appendices of the report. These shapefiles provide the location of each time series point.
tectonic-scenario-01:    Scenario 1: Mw9.2 earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region, repeat of the 1964 event, JDM.
tectonic-scenario-02:    Scenario 2: Mw9.2 earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region, repeat of the 1964 event, SDM.
tectonic-scenario-03:    Scenario 3: Mw9.3 multi-segment earthquake based on the JDM.
tectonic-scenario-04:    Scenario 4: Mw9.3 multi-segment earthquake based on the SDM.
tectonic-scenario-05:    Scenario 5: Mw8.7 earthquake of the Yakutat-Yakataga segment.
tectonic-scenario-06:    Scenario 6: Mw9.0-9.1 earthquake in the Cascadia subduction zone.
tectonic-scenario-07:    Scenario 7: Mw8.8 earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region, based on case A of the slip distribution: 4-18 km (2.5-11.2 mi) depth, uniform slip along strike.
tectonic-scenario-08:    Scenario 8: Mw8.8 earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region, based on case C of the slip distribution: 12-30 km (7.5-18.6 mi) depth, uniform slip along strike.
tectonic-scenario-09:    Scenario 9: Mw8.8 earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region, based on case D of the slip distribution: 4-18 km (2.5-11.2 mi) depth, variable slip along strike.
tectonic-scenario-10:    Scenario 10: Mw8.8 earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region, based on case F of the slip distribution: 12-30 km (7.5-18.6 mi) depth, variable slip along strike.
tectonic-scenario-11:    Scenario 11: Mw9.0 earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region: 4-18 km (2.5-11.2 mi) depth, uniform slip along strike.
tectonic-scenario-12:    Scenario 12: Mw9.0 earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region: 4-18 km (2.5-11.2 mi) depth, variable slip along strike.
tectonic-scenario-13:    Scenario 13 Mw8.8 earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region: 12-28 km (7.5-17.4 mi) to 17-30 km (10.6-18.6 mi) depth, uniform slip along strike.
  1. How should this data set be cited?

    Nicolsky, D.J., Suleimani, E.N., and Koehler, R.D., 2014, Tsunami inundation maps of Cordova and Tatitlek, Alaska: Report of Investigation RI 2014-1, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 49 p.

  2. What geographic area does the data set cover?

    West_Bounding_Coordinate: -146.742004
    East_Bounding_Coordinate: -145.500488
    North_Bounding_Coordinate: 60.902283
    South_Bounding_Coordinate: 60.510071

  3. What does it look like?

  4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?

    Beginning_Date: 2012
    Ending_Date: 2013
    Currentness_Reference: ground condition

  5. What is the general form of this data set?

    Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: report,digital data

  6. How does the data set represent geographic features?

    1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?

    2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?

      Horizontal positions are specified in geographic coordinates, that is, latitude and longitude. Latitudes are given to the nearest 0.000001. Longitudes are given to the nearest 0.000001. Latitude and longitude values are specified in decimal degrees.

      The horizontal datum used is World Geodetic System of 1984.
      The ellipsoid used is WGS 84.
      The semi-major axis of the ellipsoid used is 6378137.
      The flattening of the ellipsoid used is 1/298.257223563.

      Vertical_Coordinate_System_Definition:
      Depth_System_Definition:
      Depth_Datum_Name: Mean Higher High Water
      Depth_Resolution: 100
      Depth_Distance_Units: centimeters
      Depth_Encoding_Method: Attribute values

  7. How does the data set describe geographic features?

    ri2014-1-border-cordova.shp, ri2014-1-border-tatitlek.shp
    Outline of the study area. File format: shapefile (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys (DGGS) and Alaska Earthquake Information Center, Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska)

    ri2014-1-max-inundation-line-cordova.shp, ri2014-1-max-inundation-line-tatitlek.shp
    Shapefiles which display the estimated, "maximum credible scenario" inundation extent for the communities of Cordova and Tatitlek. These lines are based on model simulation of all credible source scenarios and historical observations. The "maximum credible scenario" inundation lines are intended to be used as a basis for local tsunami hazard planning and development of evacuation maps. File format: shapefile (Source: Alaska Earthquake Information Center, Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska, this report)

    ri2014-1-max-flow-depth-cordova.tif, ri2014-1-max-flow-depth-tatitlek.tif
    Raster image depicting maximum composite flow depths over dry land. Pixel values provide the modeled depth (in meters) of maximum inundation. For each grid point, the pixel value provides the modeled depth of water (in meters) over previously dry land, representing the maximum depth value of all calculated tsunami scenarios. File format: GeoTIFF (Source: Alaska Earthquake Information Center, Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska, this report)

    ri2014-1-time-series-points-cordova.shp, ri2014-1-time-series-points-tatitlek.shp
    To help emergency management personnel assess tsunami hazards in Cordova and Tatitlek, we supplement the inundation maps with the time series plots of the modeled water level and velocity dynamics at some on-land and some offshore locations in the communities. The plots are provided in the appendices of the report. These shapefiles provide the location of each time series point. File format: shapefile (Source: Alaska Earthquake Information Center, Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska, this report)

    Number
    Numbers correspond to labeled points and graphs shown in appendices A1 through B2 of the accompanying report. (Source: this report)

    Cordova - Appendix A1, Tatitlek - Appendix B1

    Label
    Labels correspond to titles of graphs shown in appendices A2 and B2 of the accompanying report. (Source: this report)

    Cordova - Appendix A2, Tatitlek - Appendix B2

    ri2014-1-tectonic-scenario-01-cordova.shp, ri2014-1-tectonic-scenario-01-tatitlek.shp
    Scenario 1: Mw9.2 earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region, repeat of the 1964 event, JDM. File format: shapefile (Source: Alaska Earthquake Information Center, Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska, this report)

    ri2014-1-tectonic-scenario-02-cordova.shp, ri2014-1-tectonic-scenario-02-tatitlek.shp
    Scenario 2: Mw9.2 earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region, repeat of the 1964 event, SDM. File format: shapefile (Source: Alaska Earthquake Information Center, Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska, this report)

    ri2014-1-tectonic-scenario-03-cordova.shp, ri2014-1-tectonic-scenario-03-tatitlek.shp
    Scenario 3: Mw9.3 multi-segment earthquake based on the JDM. File format: shapefile (Source: Alaska Earthquake Information Center, Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska, this report)

    ri2014-1-tectonic-scenario-04-cordova.shp, ri2014-1-tectonic-scenario-04-tatitlek.shp
    Scenario 4: Mw9.3 multi-segment earthquake based on the SDM. File format: shapefile (Source: Alaska Earthquake Information Center, Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska, this report)

    ri2014-1-tectonic-scenario-05-cordova.shp, ri2014-1-tectonic-scenario-05-tatitlek.shp
    Scenario 5: Mw8.7 earthquake of the Yakutat-Yakataga segment. File format: shapefile (Source: Alaska Earthquake Information Center, Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska, this report)

    ri2014-1-tectonic-scenario-06-cordova.shp, ri2014-1-tectonic-scenario-06-tatitlek.shp
    Scenario 6: Mw9.0-9.1 earthquake in the Cascadia subduction zone. File format: shapefile (Source: Alaska Earthquake Information Center, Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska, this report)

    ri2014-1-tectonic-scenario-07-cordova.shp, ri2014-1-tectonic-scenario-07-tatitlek.shp
    Scenario 7: Mw8.8 earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region, based on case A of the slip distribution: 4-18 km (2.5-11.2 mi) depth, uniform slip along strike. File format: shapefile (Source: Alaska Earthquake Information Center, Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska, this report)

    ri2014-1-tectonic-scenario-08-cordova.shp, ri2014-1-tectonic-scenario-08-tatitlek.shp
    Scenario 8: Mw8.8 earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region, based on case C of the slip distribution: 12-30 km (7.5-18.6 mi) depth, uniform slip along strike. File format: shapefile (Source: Alaska Earthquake Information Center, Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska, this report)

    ri2014-1-tectonic-scenario-09-cordova.shp, ri2014-1-tectonic-scenario-09-tatitlek.shp
    Scenario 9: Mw8.8 earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region, based on case D of the slip distribution: 4-18 km (2.5-11.2 mi) depth, variable slip along strike. File format: shapefile (Source: Alaska Earthquake Information Center, Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska, this report)

    ri2014-1-tectonic-scenario-10-cordova.shp, ri2014-1-tectonic-scenario-10-tatitlek.shp
    Scenario 10: Mw8.8 earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region, based on case F of the slip distribution: 12-30 km (7.5-18.6 mi) depth, variable slip along strike. File format: shapefile (Source: Alaska Earthquake Information Center, Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska, this report)

    ri2014-1-tectonic-scenario-11-cordova.shp, ri2014-1-tectonic-scenario-11-tatitlek.shp
    Scenario 11: Mw9.0 earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region: 4-18 km (2.5-11.2 mi) depth, uniform slip along strike. File format: shapefile (Source: Alaska Earthquake Information Center, Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska, this report)

    ri2014-1-tectonic-scenario-12-cordova.shp, ri2014-1-tectonic-scenario-12-tatitlek.shp
    Scenario 12: Mw9.0 earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region: 4-18 km (2.5-11.2 mi) depth, variable slip along strike. File format: shapefile (Source: Alaska Earthquake Information Center, Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska, this report)

    ri2014-1-tectonic-scenario-13-cordova.shp, ri2014-1-tectonic-scenario-13-tatitlek.shp
    Scenario 13 Mw8.8 earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region: 12-28 km (7.5-17.4 mi) to 17-30 km (10.6-18.6 mi) depth, uniform slip along strike. File format: shapefile (Source: Alaska Earthquake Information Center, Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska, this report)


Who produced the data set?

  1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)

  2. Who also contributed to the data set?

    This project was supported by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) under Reimbursable Service Agreement ADN 0931000 with the State of Alaska's Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (a division of the Department of Military and Veterans Affairs). Some of the research in this publication is sponsored by the Cooperative Institute for Alaska Research with funds from NOAA under cooperative agreement NA08OAR4320751 with the University of Alaska Fairbanks. Numerical calculations for this work were supported by a grant of High Performance Computing (HPC) resources from the Arctic Region Supercomputing Center (ARSC) at the University of Alaska Fairbanks. We thank Ronni Grapenthin and William Witte for their help with the RTK GPS survey in Cordova and Tatitlek. We also express our gratitude to Julie Elliot for her help in assessing potential earthquakes in the Yakutat block, and for sharing her data with us. Lee Liberty and Shaun Finn provided information on normal faults in Prince William Sound. Natalia Ruppert and Rod Combellick provided valuable contributions to discussions on crustal and subduction-type tsunamigenic earthquakes, and Ian Dickson proofread the manuscript. Insightful reviews by Liujuan (Rachel) Tang and Breanyn MacInnes helped improve this report.

  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?

    Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys
    GIS Manager
    3354 College Road
    Fairbanks, AK 99709-3707
    USA

    (907)451-5020 (voice)
    dggsgis@alaska.gov

    Hours_of_Service: 8 am to 4:30 pm, Monday through Friday, except State holidays


Why was the data set created?

The purpose of this study is to evaluate potential tsunami hazards for the Prince William Sound communities of Cordova and Tatitlek. We numerically model the extent of inundation from tsunami waves generated by earthquake sources and consider the results in light of historical observations. Tsunami scenarios include a repeat of the tsunami triggered by the 1964 Great Alaska Earthquake as well as tsunami waves generated by the following hypothetical scenarios: An extended 1964 rupture, a Cascadia megathrust earthquake, various earthquakes in Prince William Sound, and a Tohoku-type earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region. Results of our numerical modeling, combined with historical observations, are designed to provide guidance to local emergency management agencies in tsunami hazard assessment, evacuation planning, and public education to mitigate damage from future tsunami hazards.


How was the data set created?

  1. From what previous works were the data drawn?

  2. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?

    Date: 2013 (process 1 of 6)
    Development of nested grids - To support inundation modeling of coastal areas in Alaska, we used a series of nested telescoping grids, or digital elevation models (DEMs), as input layers for tsunami inundation modeling and mapping. These grids of increasing resolution allowed us to propagate waves generated by various sources to Cordova and Tatitlek. The bathymetric and topographic relief in each nested grid is based on DEMs developed at the National Geophysical Data Center (NGDC) of the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), in Boulder, Colorado. The extent of each grid used for our tsunami inundation mapping is listed in table 1 of the report. To provide greater DEM accuracy near the shorelines, we augmented the topographic datasets with RTK - GPS survey measurements. Survey measurements were converted to MHHW datum using methods described within the associated report. See Methodology and data section of the associated report for more detail and additional grid development source information.

    Date: 2013 (process 2 of 6)
    Model validation - The numerical model that we used for simulation of tsunami wave propagation and runup was validated through a set of analytical benchmarks and tested against laboratory data. The model solves nonlinear shallow water equations using a finite-difference method on a staggered grid. See Methodology and data section of the associated manuscript for more detail and additional model information.

    Date: 2013 (process 3 of 6)
    Model verification - First, we simulated the tectonic tsunami in Cordova and Tatitlek using an output of a coseismic deformation model of the 1964 earthquake as an initial condition for water waves. We then compared the modeled water level dynamics and flooding with the eyewitness reports and observations collected shortly after the event. See Methodology and data and Modeling results sections of the associated manuscript for more detail and additional model information.

    Date: 2013 (process 4 of 6)
    Numerical simulations of hypothetical tsunami scenarios - We assessed hazard related to tectonic tsunamis in Cordova and Tatitlek by performing model simulations for each hypothetical earthquake source scenario. Numerical results for each scenario include extent of inundation, sea level and velocity time series, and tsunami flow depth. See Modeling results section of the associated manuscript for more detail and additional information.

    Date: 2013 (process 5 of 6)
    Compilation of maximum inundation zone and maximum flow depths - We calculated maximum composite extent of inundation by combining the maximum calculated inundation extents of all scenarios. The same method was used for calculation of maximum flow depths over dry land. See Modeling results section of the associated manuscript for more detail and additional information.

    Date: 2014 (process 6 of 6)
    Calculation of the potential inundation lines - For each grid cell in the high-resolution DEMs of Cordova and Tatitlek, we determined whether the cell was inundated by waves or stayed dry throughout the entire simulation. Then, we defined a function such that it is equal to one at the center of each wet cell and is negative one at the center of each dry cell. Using a linear interpolation algorithm in Matlab, we plotted a zero-value contour that delineates dry and wet cells from each other. The resultant contour line (or a collection of lines if the contour is not a simply connected) was directly exported to the ArcGIS using WGS84 datum.

  3. What similar or related data should the user be aware of?

    Nicolsky, D.J., Suleimani, E.N., Combellick, R.A., and Hansen, R.A., 2011, Tsunami inundation maps of Whittier and western Passage Canal, Alaska: Report of Investigation RI 2011-7, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 65 p
    Nicolsky, D.J., Suleimani, E.N., Haeussler, P.J., Ryan, H.F., Koehler, R.D., Combellick, R.A., and Hansen, R.A., 2013, Tsunami inundation maps of Port Valdez, Alaska: Report of Investigation RI 2013-1, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 77 p., 1 sheet, scale 1:12,500
    Suleimani, E.N., Combellick, R.A., Marriott, D., Hansen, R.A., Venturato, A.J., and Newman, J.C., 2005, Tsunami hazard maps of the Homer and Seldovia areas, Alaska: Report of Investigation RI 2005-2, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 28 p., 2 sheets, scale 1:12,500
    Suleimani, E.N., Hansen, R.A., Combellick, R.A., and Carver, G.A., 2002, Tsunami hazard maps of the Kodiak area, Alaska: Report of Investigation RI 2002-1, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 16 p., 4 sheets, scale 1:12,500
    Suleimani, E.N., Nicolsky, D.J., West, D.A., Combellick, R.A., and Hansen, R.A., 2010, Tsunami inundation maps of Seward and northern Resurrection Bay, Alaska: Report of Investigation RI 2010-1, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 47 p., 3 sheets, scale 1:12,500
    Suleimani, E.N., Nicolsky, D.J., and Koehler, R.D., 2013, Tsunami inundation maps of Sitka, Alaska: Report of Investigation RI 2013-3, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 76 p., 1 sheet, scale 1:250,000


How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?

  1. How well have the observations been checked?

    The presented maps have been completed using the best information available and are believed to be accurate; however, their preparation required many assumptions. We have considered several tsunami scenarios and have provided an estimate of maximum credible tsunami inundation. Actual conditions during a tsunami event may vary from those considered, so the accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Landslide tsunami sources are not included in the current study due to unknown potential impact of such events on the study area. The limits of inundation shown should only be used as a guideline for emergency planning and response action. Actual areas inundated will depend on specifics of earth deformations, on-land construction, and tide level, and may differ from areas shown on the map. The information on this map is intended to permit state and local agencies to plan emergency evacuation and tsunami response actions in the event of a major tsunamigenic earthquake. These results are not intended for land-use regulation. Users should review the accompanying report, particularly the Sources of Errors and Uncertainties section, for a detailed discussion of limitations of the methods used to generate the various inundation models. This report has received technical reviews by several scientists familiar with the subject matter. We incorporated the reviewer's suggestions into the final draft.

  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?

    The extent of tsunami inundation was calculated through numerical modeling of water waves over bathymetry and topography. To efficiently compute a detailed map of potential tsunami inundation, we employed a series of nested computational grids. A nested grid allows for higher resolution in areas where it is needed, without expending computer resources in areas where it is not. The computational grid was based on digital elevation models (DEMs) obtained from various U.S. federal and academic agencies. The highest level of horizontal resolution of the grid used for inundation modeling is about 15 m (49 ft). This scale is mostly limited by the computational resources necessary to compute the tsunami inundation at the higher resolution. The 15 m (49 ft) resolution is high enough to describe major relief features, but small topographic features, buildings, and other facilities cannot be accurately resolved by the existing model. For additional information please reference the Grid Development and Data Sources section of the associated report.

  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?

    The vertical accuracy of the inundation modeling is dependent on the accuracy and resolution of the digital elevation models (DEMs) and tidal datum values that were used to compile the computational grid. Prior to scenario modeling, bathymetric data were shifted to use Mean Higher High Water (MHHW) as the vertical datum. There is a reason to believe that the high-resolution DEM might have some discrepancies at the following two locations. The first location is at the intersection of Water Street and Railroad Avenue (marked with orange crossed circles in figure 20), while the second location is between the Coast Guard Lane and Industry Road (marked with blue crossed circles). Both locations are adjacent to the steep slopes, and hence while developing the DEM for Cordova, the slope terrain might have crept into low-lying regions. Unfortunately, we do not have GPS measurements at either location. Therefore, we adjust the maximum composite inundation extent and assume that both locations might be flooded as nearby areas. The depths of inundation shown should be used only as a guideline for emergency planning and response action. Actual inundation water depth will depend on specifics of the earth deformations, on-land construction, and tide level, and they may differ from areas shown by this data. The information is intended to permit state and local agencies to plan emergency evacuation and tsunami response actions in the event of a major tsunamigenic earthquake. These results are not intended for land-use regulation or building-code development. For additional information please reference the Grid Development and Data Sources section of the associated manuscript.

  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?

    Model validation for this report included modeling of the 1964 tsunami and comparison of the modeled results to observations that were recorded in the historic record. Due to various factors described within accompanying manuscript we were unable to fully account for discrepancies between modeled results and observed water dynamics. We determined that future work is necessary to fully analyze the discrepancy. The dataset contains calculated tsunami inundation limits for tectonic source scenarios. However, tsunamis caused by underwater slope failures are also a significant hazard in the bays of coastal Alaska. Southcentral Alaska has a long record of tsunami waves generated by submarine and subaerial landslides, avalanches, and rock falls. While we acknowledge that coastal communities in Alaska are considered at risk from locally generated waves because of their proximity to landslide-prone areas in a seismically active zone, we did not quantify this category of tsunami hazard in the current report due to poor constraints on the parameters required for to build an appropriate model.

  5. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?

    Model validation for this report included modeling of the 1964 tsunami and comparison of the modeled results to observations that were recorded in the historic record.


How can someone get a copy of the data set?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?

Access_Constraints:
This report, map, and/or dataset is available directly from the State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys (see contact information below).
Use_Constraints:
This dataset includes results of numerical modeling of earthquake-generated tsunami waves for a specific community. Modeling was completed using the best information and tsunami modeling software available at the time of analysis. They are numerical solutions and, while they are believed to be accurate, their ultimate accuracy during an actual tsunami will depend on the specifics of earth deformations, on-land construction, tide level, and other parameters at the time of the tsunami. Actual areas of inundation may differ from areas shown in this dataset. Landslide tsunami sources may not be included in the modeling due to unknown potential impact of such events on a given community; please refer to accompanying report for more information on tsunami sources used for this study. The limits of inundation shown should only be used as a general guideline for emergency planning and response action in the event of a major tsunamigenic earthquake. These results are not intended for any other use, including land-use regulation or actuarial purposes. Any hard copies or published datasets utilizing these datasets shall clearly indicate their source. If the user has modified the data in any way, the user is obligated to describe the types of modifications the user has made. The user specifically agrees not to misrepresent these datasets, nor to imply that changes made by the user were approved by the State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys. The State of Alaska makes no express or implied warranties (including warranties for merchantability and fitness) with respect to the character, functions, or capabilities of the electronic data or products or their appropriateness for any user's purposes. In no event will the State of Alaska be liable for any incidental, indirect, special, consequential, or other damages suffered by the user or any other person or entity whether from the use of the electronic services or products or any failure thereof or otherwise. In no event will the State of Alaska's liability to the Requestor or anyone else exceed the fee paid for the electronic service or product.

  1. Who distributes the data set? (Distributor 1 of 1)

    Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys
    3354 College Road
    Fairbanks, AK 99709-3707
    USA

    (907)451-5020 (voice)
    (907)451-5050 (FAX)
    dggspubs@alaska.gov

    Hours_of_Service: 8 am to 4:30 pm, Monday through Friday, except State holidays
    Contact_Instructions:
    Please view our website (<http://www.dggs.alaska.gov>) for the latest information on available data. Please contact us using the e-mail address provided above when possible.
  2. What's the catalog number I need to order this data set?

    RI 2014-1

  3. What legal disclaimers am I supposed to read?

    The State of Alaska makes no expressed or implied warranties (including warranties for merchantability and fitness) with respect to the character, functions, or capabilities of the electronic data or products or their appropriateness for any user's purposes. In no event will the State of Alaska be liable for any incidental, indirect, special, consequential, or other damages suffered by the user or any other person or entity whether from the use of the electronic services or products or any failure thereof or otherwise. In no event will the State of Alaska's liability to the Requestor or anyone else exceed the fee paid for the electronic service or product.

  4. How can I download or order the data?


Who wrote the metadata?

Dates:
Last modified: 31-Jul-2014
Metadata author:
Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys
Metadata Manager
3354 College Road
Fairbanks, AK 99709-3707
USA

(907)451-5020 (voice)

Metadata standard:
FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (FGDC-STD-001-1998)
Metadata extensions used:


Generated by mp version 2.9.21 on Thu Jul 31 11:59:59 2014