Geologic map of the Talkeetna Mountains C-4 Quadrangle and adjoining areas, central Alaska

Metadata also available as - [Parseable text] - [XML]

Frequently anticipated questions:


What does this data set describe?

Title:
Geologic map of the Talkeetna Mountains C-4 Quadrangle and adjoining areas, central Alaska
Abstract:
The Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys (DGGS), in partnership with the U.S. National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program, mapped approximately 450 mi2 of the Talkeetna Mountains region of central Alaska at 1:50,000 scale over the course of six weeks in 2014. This area contains significant exposures of Late Triassic mafic volcanics and gabbro sills that have been the focus of region-wide exploration for the Strategic and Critical platinum-group elements (PGEs). The area also exposes numerous inactive and possibly active faults which project through the area of proposed hydropower development. The resulting geologic map offers an improved understanding of the geology, structural history, and mineral potential of the area.
Supplemental_Information:
border:    A polygon that encompasses the geographic extent of the data observations.
ContactsAndFaults:    Line features depicting faults and geologic contacts
DataSourcePolys:    Polygons that delineate data sources for various parts of the map
FossilPoints:    Fossil location points
GeochronPoints:    Geochronology sample location points
GeologicLines:    Dikes, coal seams, ash beds, glacial features, anticline and syncline hinge-surface traces, and other kinds of key beds that do not participate in map-unit topology
MapUnitPolys:    Polygons that record the distribution of mapped or interpreted geologic units
OrientationPoints:    A point file that provides field station locations, symbology, and associated structure data (bedding attitudes, foliation attitudes, slip vectors measured at a point, etc.)
Stations:    A point file that provides location information, observations, and other data specific to each field observation station.
  1. How should this data set be cited?

    Twelker, Evan, Hubbard, T.D., Wypych, Alicja, Sicard, K.R., Newberry, R.J., Reioux, D.A., Freeman, L.K., and Lande, L.L., 2015, Geologic map of the Talkeetna Mountains C-4 Quadrangle and adjoining areas, central Alaska: Preliminary Interpretive Report PIR 2015-6, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 16 p., 1 sheet, scale 1:50,000.

  2. What geographic area does the data set cover?

    West_Bounding_Coordinate: -149.024852
    East_Bounding_Coordinate: -148.355520
    North_Bounding_Coordinate: 62.757514
    South_Bounding_Coordinate: 62.348564

  3. What does it look like?

  4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?

    Beginning_Date: 2013
    Ending_Date: 2014
    Currentness_Reference: ground condition

  5. What is the general form of this data set?

    Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: report and digital data

  6. How does the data set represent geographic features?

    1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?

      This is a vector data set.

    2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?

      Grid_Coordinate_System_Name: Universal Transverse Mercator
      Universal_Transverse_Mercator:
      UTM_Zone_Number: 6
      Transverse_Mercator:
      Scale_Factor_at_Central_Meridian: 0.999600
      Longitude_of_Central_Meridian: -147
      Latitude_of_Projection_Origin: 0
      False_Easting: 500000.000000
      False_Northing: 0

      Planar coordinates are encoded using coordinate pair
      Abscissae (x-coordinates) are specified to the nearest .00000001
      Ordinates (y-coordinates) are specified to the nearest .00000001
      Planar coordinates are specified in Meters

      The horizontal datum used is North American Datum of 1927.
      The ellipsoid used is Clarke 1866.
      The semi-major axis of the ellipsoid used is 6378206.4.
      The flattening of the ellipsoid used is 1/294.9786982.

  7. How does the data set describe geographic features?

    pir2015-6-border.shp
    A polygon that encompasses the geographic extent of the data observations. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    pir2015-6-ContactsAndFaults.shp
    Line features depicting faults and geologic contacts (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys and the NCGMP09 - Draft Standard Format for Digital Publication of Geologic Maps, Version 1.1 by the USGS National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program (NCGMP), note that all field names were derived from the standard but truncated at ten characters.)

    Type
    Specifies the kind of feature represented by the line (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    The line features are: Fault, Surficial Contact, Contact, and Inferred thrust fault

    IsConceale
    This is a flag to identify contacts and faults covered by an overlying map unit. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    ValueDefinition
    NThe feature IS NOT covered by an overlying map unit.
    YThe feature IS covered by an overlying map unit.

    ExistenceC
    Indicates the degree of confidence and/or certainty in the interpretation of a each line segment's existence. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    ValueDefinition
    CertainIndicates that the author has sufficient observational and/or other supporting data to be reasonably confident in the scientific credibility of the interpretation of the feature. The level of certainty is specific to the map scale.
    QuestionableThe interpretation of the feature at the mapped scale fits the overall proposed geologic model but the extent and/or classification is questionable or uncertain due to insufficient observations and/or supporting data.

    IdentityCo
    Indicates degree of confidence in the identification and classification of the line segment. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    ValueDefinition
    CertainIndicates that the author has sufficient observational and/or other supporting data to be reasonably confident in the scientific credibility of the interpretation of the feature. The level of certainty is specific to the map scale.
    QuestionableThe interpretation of the feature at the mapped scale fits the overall proposed geologic model but the extent and/or classification is questionable or uncertain due to insufficient observations and/or supporting data.

    LocationCo
    Half-width in meters of positional uncertainty envelope; position is relative to other features in the data. A value of -9 indicates that this measure is not available. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    Range of values
    Minimum:10
    Maximum:250
    Units:meters

    Symbol
    References the symbol value that was assigned to the line segment. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:FGDC Digital Cartographic Standard for Geologic Map Symbolization; Appendix A. Geologic map symbols, colors, and patterns, "REF NO" field
    Codeset Source:Federal Geographic Data Committee [prepared for the Federal Geographic Data Committee by the U.S. Geological Survey], 2006, FGDC Digital Cartographic Standard for Geologic Map Symbolization: Reston, Va., Federal Geographic Data Committee Document Number FGDC-STD-013-2006, 290 p., 2 plates.

    Label
    Formal name of selected features. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    The labeled features are: SLOT LAKE FAULT, CENTRAL RAINGELLIA FAULT, and RANGE FRONT FAULT

    Notes
    Free text for additional information about the feature. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    The notes indicate the basis of the feature interpretation: "Inferred from SDMI IfSAR orthorectified radar intensity image", "Adapted from Adams and others (1985; unpublished) Plate 1", "Adapted from Oswald (2006) Map B", "Break in 900Hz EM", "Location inferred from airborne magnetic survey", and "Location inferred from airborne resistivity survey"

    pir2015-6-DataSourcePolys.shp
    Polygons that delineate data sources for various parts of the map (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys and the NCGMP09 - Draft Standard Format for Digital Publication of Geologic Maps, Version 1.1 by the USGS National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program (NCGMP), note that all field names were derived from the standard but truncated at ten characters.)

    Notes
    Free text for additional information about the feature. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    The notes indicate the basis of the feature interpretation: "Oswald, 2006 (Map B)", "Adams and others, 1985 (unpublished) (Plate 2)", "Rose, 1967 (GR 32)", "Amos and Cole, 2001 (Map B)", "Oswald, 2006 (Map A)", "Adams and others, 1985 (unpublished) (Plate 1)", and "Van Wyck, 2006 (Figure 6)"

    pir2015-6-FossilPoints.shp
    Fossil location points (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys and the NCGMP09 - Draft Standard Format for Digital Publication of Geologic Maps, Version 1.1 by the USGS National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program (NCGMP), note that all field names were derived from the standard but truncated at ten characters.)

    StationID
    Identifier assigned by person who originally located station (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    Generic example of a sample identifier: YYYYAAA9999X: YY or YYYY= year, AAA=geologist's initials (one to three characters), 9999=unique station number, X= optional alpha character which indicates that multiple samples were collected at a given location or that multiple observations were recorded in the project database.

    Label
    Text string to display along with station symbol (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    free text that is intended to display adjacent to the label point on the map

    MaterialAn
    Material analyzed (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    free text description of the rock sample; transcribed from geologists' field notes

    PlotAtScal
    The scale at which the observation should be plotted (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    Range of values
    Minimum:50000
    Maximum:50000

    LocationCo
    Radius in meters of positional uncertainty envelope (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    Range of values
    Minimum:10
    Maximum:10
    Units:meters

    FossilForm
    Information about the type or form of the fossil (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    free text description of the fossil

    FossilAge
    Information about the age of the fossil (Source: this study (R.B. Blodgett))

    free text description of the fossil age

    Notes
    Free text for additional information about the feature (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    The notes indicate the source of the feature interpretation: " and "this study (R.B. Blodgett)"

    pir2015-6-GeochronPoints.shp
    Geochronology sample location points (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys and the NCGMP09 - Draft Standard Format for Digital Publication of Geologic Maps, Version 1.1 by the USGS National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program (NCGMP), note that all field names were derived from the standard but truncated at ten characters.)

    Type
    The geochronology method used to provide the age value (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    The samples were analyzed by: ArAr

    StationID
    Identifier assigned by person who originally located station (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    Generic example of a sample identifier: YYYYAAA9999X: YY or YYYY= year, AAA=geologist's initials (one to three characters), 9999=unique station number, X= optional alpha character which indicates that multiple samples were collected at a given location or that multiple observations were recorded in the project database.

    MapUnit
    Short ASCII string that indicates the map unit. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    ValueDefinition
    KhgHORNBLENDE GABBRO (Cretaceous)
    PPvaALTERED METAVOLCANIC ROCKS (Pennsylvanian to Permian)
    Trg1GABBRO, AFFILIATED WITH UNIT Trn1 (Late Triassic)
    Trr1LOWER RHYOLITE (Tertiary)
    JgdGRANODIORITE TO TONALITE (Middle Jurassic)
    KgGRANITIC ROCKS (Late Cretaceous)
    KdpDACITE PORPHYRY (Late Cretaceous)
    TtapANDESITE PORPHYRY (Tertiary)
    JPzaAMPHIBOLITE (Late Paleozoic to Early Jurassic)
    TsdpDACITE PORPHYRY (Tertiary)
    TsbBASALT FLOWS (Tertiary)
    TrilINTERLAYERED UNIT (Tertiary)
    TrPsMETASEDIMENTARY ROCKS (Pennsylvanian to Triassic)

    Label
    Text string to display along with symbol (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    free text that is intended to display adjacent to the label point on the map

    MaterialAn
    Material analyzed (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    free text description of the rock sample; transcribed from geologists' field notes

    PlotAtScal
    The scale at which the observation should be plotted (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    Range of values
    Minimum:50000
    Maximum:50000

    LocationCo
    Radius in meters of positional uncertainty envelope (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    Range of values
    Minimum:10
    Maximum:10
    Units:meters

    Age
    The interpreted (preferred) age calculated from geochronology analysis (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    Range of values
    Minimum:21.6
    Maximum:223
    Units:MA (million years ago)

    AgePlusErr
    Error associated with the age value (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    Range of values
    Minimum:0.2
    Maximum:4
    Units:MA (million years ago)

    AgeMinusEr
    Error associated with the age value (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    Range of values
    Minimum:0.2
    Maximum:4
    Units:Ma (million years ago)

    AgeUnits
    Units for numeric values in the age and age error fields. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    ValueDefinition
    Mamillion years ago

    Notes
    Free text for additional information about the feature. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    The notes indicate the source of the feature interpretation: "Benowitz and others, 2015", "Oswald, 2006", and "Benowitz and others, 2014"

    pir2015-6-GeologicLines.shp
    Dikes, coal seams, ash beds, glacial features, anticline and syncline hinge-surface traces, and other kinds of key beds that do not participate in map-unit topology (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys and the NCGMP09 - Draft Standard Format for Digital Publication of Geologic Maps, Version 1.1 by the USGS National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program (NCGMP), note that all field names were derived from the standard but truncated at ten characters.)

    Type
    Specifies the kind of feature represented by the line (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    The line features are: Syncline, Anticline, BasaltDike, IntermediateDike, Esker, and Moraine

    IsConceale
    This is a flag to identify contacts and faults covered by an overlying map unit. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    ValueDefinition
    NThe feature IS NOT covered by an overlying map unit.

    ExistenceC
    Indicates the degree of confidence and/or certainty in the interpretation of a each line segment's existence. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    ValueDefinition
    CertainIndicates that the author has sufficient observational and/or other supporting data to be reasonably confident in the scientific credibility of the interpretation of the feature. The level of certainty is specific to the map scale.

    IdentityCo
    Indicates degree of confidence in the identification and classification of the line segment. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    ValueDefinition
    CertainIndicates that the author has sufficient observational and/or other supporting data to be reasonably confident in the scientific credibility of the interpretation of the feature. The level of certainty is specific to the map scale.

    LocationCo
    Half-width in meters of positional uncertainty envelope; position is relative to other features in the data. A value of -9 indicates that this measure is not available. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    Range of values
    Minimum:50
    Maximum:250
    Units:meters

    Symbol
    References the symbol value that was assigned to the line segment. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:FGDC Digital Cartographic Standard for Geologic Map Symbolization; Appendix A. Geologic map symbols, colors, and patterns, "REF NO" field
    Codeset Source:Federal Geographic Data Committee [prepared for the Federal Geographic Data Committee by the U.S. Geological Survey], 2006, FGDC Digital Cartographic Standard for Geologic Map Symbolization: Reston, Va., Federal Geographic Data Committee Document Number FGDC-STD-013-2006, 290 p., 2 plates.

    pir2015-6-MapUnitPolys.shp
    Polygons that record the distribution of mapped or interpreted geologic units (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys and the NCGMP09 - Draft Standard Format for Digital Publication of Geologic Maps, Version 1.1 by the USGS National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program (NCGMP), note that all field names were derived from the standard but truncated at ten characters.)

    MapUnit
    Short ASCII string that indicates the map unit. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    ValueDefinition
    JPzaAMPHIBOLITE (Late Paleozoic to Early Jurassic)
    JPzogORTHOGNEISS (Late Paleozoic to Early Jurassic)
    JPzpgPARAGNEISS (Late Paleozoic to Early Jurassic)
    JgdGRANODIORITE TO TONALITE (Middle Jurassic)
    KJmfMETAFLYSCH (Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous)
    KdpDACITE PORPHYRY (Late Cretaceous)
    KgGRANITIC ROCKS (Late Cretaceous)
    KhgHORNBLENDE GABBRO (Cretaceous)
    PPfvFELSIC METAVOLCANIC ROCKS (Pennsylvanian to Permian)
    PPmvMAFIC TO INTERMEDIATE METAVOLCANIC ROCKS (Pennsylvanian to Permian)
    PPvaALTERED METAVOLCANIC ROCKS (Pennsylvanian to Permian)
    PlLIMESTONE AND MARBLE (Late Permian)
    QaUNDIFFERENTIATED FLOODPLAIN ALLUVIUM
    QaaACTIVE-FLOODPLAIN ALLUVIUM
    QafALLUVIAL-FAN DEPOSITS
    QaiINACTIVE-FLOODPLAIN ALLUVIUM
    QcUNDIFFERENTIATED COLLUVIUM
    QcdDEBRIS-FLOW DEPOSITS
    QcfMIXED COLLUVIUM AND ALLUVIUM
    QcgROCK GLACIER DEPOSITS
    QctTALUS
    Qgd1DRIFT OF EARLY WISCONSINAN AGE (75,000 TO 40,000 Y.B.P.)
    Qgd2DRIFT OF LATE WISCONSINAN AGE, UNDIFFERENTIATED (25,000 TO 11,000 Y.B.P.)
    Qgd3TILL AND ASSOCIATED MORAINAL DEPOSITS OF LATEST WISCONSINAN AGE (11,000 TO 9,000 Y.B.P.)
    Qgds1ICE STAGNATION TILL OF EARLY WISCONSINAN AGE (75,000 TO 40,000 Y.B.P.)
    Qgds3ICE STAGNATION TILL OF LATEST WISCONSINAN AGE (11,000 TO 9,000 YEARS BEFORE PRESENT [Y.B.P.])
    Qgf2OUTWASH OF LATE WISCONSINAN AGE, UNDIFFERENTIATED
    Qgf3OUTWASH OF LATEST WISCONSINAN AGE
    QlLACUSTRINE DEPOSITS
    QldLAKE DELTA DEPOSITS
    QpSWAMP DEPOSITS
    TdbBASALT (Tertiary)
    TrPsMETASEDIMENTARY ROCKS (Pennsylvanian to Triassic)
    TrgGABBRO (Late Triassic)
    Trg1GABBRO, AFFILIATED WITH UNIT Trn1 (Late Triassic)
    Trg2GABBRO, AFFILIATED WITH UNIT Trn2 (Late Triassic)
    TrilINTERLAYERED UNIT (Tertiary)
    TrivINTERMEDIATE VOLCANICLASTIC ROCKS (Tertiary)
    TrlLIMESTONE AND MARBLE (Late Triassic)
    Trn1NIKOLAI GREENSTONE, LOWER MEMBER (Late Triassic)
    Trn2NIKOLAI GREENS TONE, UPPER MEMBER (Late Triassic)
    Trr1LOWER RHYOLITE (Tertiary)
    Trr2UPPER RHYOLITE (Tertiary)
    TrrpRHYOLITE PORPHYRY (Tertiary)
    TrsvMETASEDIMENTARY AND METAVOLCANIC ROCKS (Late Triassic)
    TsaANDESITE FLOWS (Tertiary)
    TsbBASALT FLOWS (Tertiary)
    TsdDACITE (Tertiary)
    TsdpDACITE PORPHYRY (Tertiary)
    TsrRHYOLITE (Tertiary)
    TtaANDESITE FLOWS (Tertiary)
    TtapANDESITE PORPHYRY (Tertiary)
    TtbBASALT FLOWS (Tertiary)
    TtdDACITE FLOWS (Tertiary)
    Waterpolygon is a waterbody

    IdentityCo
    Indicates degree of confidence in the identification and classification of the feature. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    ValueDefinition
    CertainIndicates that the author has sufficient observational and/or other supporting data to be reasonably confident in the scientific credibility of the interpretation of the feature. The level of certainty is specific to the map scale.
    QuestionableThe interpretation of the feature at the mapped scale fits the overall proposed geologic model but the extent and/or classification is questionable or uncertain due to insufficient observations and/or supporting data.

    Label
    The label values provide the FGDCGeoAge font characters that are required to display the geologic symbols that are appropriate to the map unit assigned in the corresponding MapUnit field. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    ValueDefinition
    NULLnot applicable

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:FGDCGeoAge font
    Codeset Source:Federal Geographic Data Committee [prepared for the Federal Geographic Data Committee by the U.S. Geological Survey], 2006, FGDC Digital Cartographic Standard for Geologic Map Symbolization: Reston, Va., Federal Geographic Data Committee Document Number FGDC-STD-013-2006, 290 p., 2 plates.

    Symbol
    References the CMYK color value that was assigned to the map unit (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    ValueDefinition
    0AX0CMYK value - C:0%, M:8%, Y:100%, K:0%
    00X0CMYK value - C:0%, M:0%, Y:100%, K:0%
    0A40CMYK value - C:0%, M:8%, Y:40%, K:0%
    0060CMYK value - C:0%, M:0%, Y:60%, K:0%
    0A60CMYK value - C:0%, M:8%, Y:60%, K:0%
    0150CMYK value - C:0%, M:13%, Y:50%, K:0%
    01X0CMYK value - C:0%, M:13%, Y:100%, K:0%
    0030CMYK value - C:0%, M:0%, Y:30%, K:0%
    0020CMYK value - C:0%, M:0%, Y:20%, K:0%
    0040CMYK value - C:0%, M:0%, Y:40%, K:0%
    0050CMYK value - C:0%, M:0%, Y:50%, K:0%
    0A50CMYK value - C:0%, M:8%, Y:50%, K:0%
    0010CMYK value - C:0%, M:0%, Y:13%, K:0%
    0070CMYK value - C:0%, M:0%, Y:70%, K:0%
    2XX0CMYK value - C:20%, M:100%, Y:100%, K:0%
    X160CMYK value - C:100%, M:13%, Y:60%, K:0%
    3X60CMYK value - C:30%, M:100%, Y:60%, K:0%
    3X40CMYK value - C:30%, M:100%, Y:40%, K:0%
    3XA0CMYK value - C:30%, M:100%, Y:8%, K:0%
    X360CMYK value - C:100%, M:30%, Y:60%, K:0%
    X530CMYK value - C:100%, M:50%, Y:30%, K:0%
    X440CMYK value - C:100%, M:40%, Y:40%, K:0%
    0500CMYK value - C:0%, M:50%, Y:0%, K:0%
    17X0CMYK value - C:13%, M:70%, Y:100%, K:0%
    13X0CMYK value - C:13%, M:30%, Y:100%, K:0%
    62A0CMYK value - C:60%, M:20%, Y:8%, K:0%
    2000CMYK value - C:20%, M:0%, Y:0%, K:0%
    50A0CMYK value - C:50%, M:0%, Y:8%, K:0%
    0550CMYK value - C:0%, M:50%, Y:50%, K:0%
    X220CMYK value - C:100%, M:20%, Y:20%, K:0%
    0200CMYK value - C:0%, M:20%, Y:0%, K:0%
    1X60CMYK value - C:13%, M:100%, Y:60%, K:0%
    5310CMYK value - C:50%, M:30%, Y:13%, K:0%
    2X20CMYK value - C:20%, M:100%, Y:20%, K:0%
    52X0CMYK value - C:50%, M:20%, Y:100%, K:0%
    15X0CMYK value - C:13%, M:50%, Y:100%, K:0%
    A260CMYK value - C:8%, M:20%, Y:60%, K:0%
    0450CMYK value - C:0%, M:40%, Y:50%, K:0%
    1530CMYK value - C:13%, M:50%, Y:30%, K:0%
    1330CMYK value - C:13%, M:30%, Y:30%, K:0%
    1430CMYK value - C:13%, M:40%, Y:30%, K:0%
    2540CMYK value - C:20%, M:50%, Y:40%, K:0%
    A570CMYK value - C:8%, M:50%, Y:70%, K:0%
    0700CMYK value - C:0%, M:70%, Y:0%, K:0%
    4020CMYK value - C:40%, M:0%, Y:20%, K:0%
    0650CMYK value - C:0%, M:60%, Y:50%, K:0%

    Notes
    Free text for additional information about the feature. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    The notes indicate the basis of the feature interpretation: "Plug", "inferred from 7200Hz", and "Outline based on topographic relief"

    pir2015-6-OrientationPoints.shp
    A point file that provides field station locations, symbology, and associated structure data (bedding attitudes, foliation attitudes, slip vectors measured at a point, etc.) (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys and the NCGMP09 - Draft Standard Format for Digital Publication of Geologic Maps, Version 1.1 by the USGS National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program (NCGMP), note that all field names were derived from the standard but truncated at ten characters.)

    Type
    The type of feature measured (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    The type of feature measured: mylonitic foliation, cleavage, compaction foliation, joint surface, flow, schistosity, fault, shear band, metamorphic foliation, vein wall, bedding, fracture surface, boudinage, crenulation cleavage, dike wall, bedding with tops, dike contact, axial plane, igneous layering or foliation, bed parallel schistosity, slickenside surface, minor slip surface, gneissic layering, fold axis, slaty cleavage, outcrop trend, minor fault, igneous flow banding, major fault, bedding from photo, sill, spaced cleavage, mineral lineation, crenulation lineation, stretched mineral, slickenline, boudins, rods, intersection lineation, stretched pebble, fault trend, vein trend, hinge line, stretched clast, and striation

    StationID
    Identifier assigned by person who originally located station (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    Generic example of a sample identifier: YYYYAAA9999X: YY or YYYY= year, AAA=geologist's initials (one to three characters), 9999=unique station number, X= optional alpha character which indicates that multiple samples were collected at a given location or that multiple observations were recorded in the project database.

    Symbol
    References the symbol value that was assigned to the line segment. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:FGDC Digital Cartographic Standard for Geologic Map Symbolization; Appendix A. Geologic map symbols, colors, and patterns, "REF NO" field
    Codeset Source:Federal Geographic Data Committee [prepared for the Federal Geographic Data Committee by the U.S. Geological Survey], 2006, FGDC Digital Cartographic Standard for Geologic Map Symbolization: Reston, Va., Federal Geographic Data Committee Document Number FGDC-STD-013-2006, 290 p., 2 plates.

    Label
    Text string to display along with symbol, usually dip and plunge values for measured orientations (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    free text that is intended to display adjacent to the label point on the map

    PlotAtScal
    The scale at which the observation should be plotted (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:50000

    LocationCo
    Radius in meters of positional uncertainty envelope (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    Range of values
    Minimum:10
    Maximum:250
    Units:meters

    Azimuth
    Strike or trend, measured in degrees clockwise from geographic North. These values use right-hand rule (dip is to right of azimuth direction). (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:359
    Units:degrees

    Inclinatio
    Dip or plunge, measured in degrees down from horizontal. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:90
    Units:degrees

    IdentityCo
    Indicates degree of confidence in the identification and classification of the line segment. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    ValueDefinition
    CertainIndicates that the author has sufficient observational and/or other supporting data to be reasonably confident in the scientific credibility of the interpretation of the feature. The level of certainty is specific to the map scale.

    pir2015-6-Stations.shp
    A point file that provides location information, observations, and other data specific to each field observation station. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys and the NCGMP09 - Draft Standard Format for Digital Publication of Geologic Maps, Version 1.1 by the USGS National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program (NCGMP), note that all field names were derived from the standard but truncated at ten characters.)

    FieldID
    Identifier assigned by person who originally located station. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    Generic example of a sample identifier: YYYYAAA9999X: YY or YYYY= year, AAA=geologist's initials (one to three characters), 9999=unique station number, X= optional alpha character which indicates that multiple samples were collected at a given location or that multiple observations were recorded in the project database.

    LocationCo
    Radius in meters of positional uncertainty envelope (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    Range of values
    Minimum:10
    Maximum:10
    Units:meters

    LocationMe
    Term that categorizes technique used to determine station location. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    ValueDefinition
    handheld GPSLocation data were collected using an unspecified model of Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver.

    TimeDate
    Time and date of observation at the station (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    Range of values
    Minimum:6/25/2014
    Maximum:8/3/2014
    Units:Calendar Date

    Observer
    Name of the person who located station (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    Field investigators were: Freeman, Lawrence K., Lande, Lauren, Newberry, R.J, Reioux, David A., Sicard, Karri R., Twelker, Evan and Wypych, Alicja

    Notes
    Additional information about the station (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    Free text description. Note: the value may be truncated if the description exceeds 255 characters


Who produced the data set?

  1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)

  2. Who also contributed to the data set?

    This project is jointly funded by the State's Strategic and Critical Minerals Assessment program (part of the Airborne Geological/Geophysical Mineral Inventory [AGGMI]) and the USGS National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program, STATEMAP component, under award number G14AC00167 for 2014. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Government. We acknowledge Cook Inlet Region Inc. (CIRI), Chickaloon Moose Creek Native Association, Knikatnu, Ninilchik Natives Association, Salamatof Native Association, Seldovia Native Association, and Tyonek Native Corporation for supporting the project and providing access to private lands in the mapping area. Brenda Becker of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Glennallen Field Office assisted us with permitting on BLM-managed lands. We thank Peter Oswald, Jeanine Schmidt, Melanie Werdon, Ben Porterfield, David Adams, Laurel Burns, Ken Ridgway, and others for geological discussions that helped us prepare for the field and understand our results when we returned. Jeff Benowitz and Paul Layer of the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) Geochronology Lab provided 40Ar/39Ar analyses and assisted us in their interpretation, and Ken Severin of the UAF Advanced Instrumentation Laboratory assisted us with the microprobe. Scott Arko of the UAF Alaska Satellite Facility furnished us with orthorectified areal imagery. We appreciate the attempts of Paul O'Sullivan and GeoSep Services to recover zircons from some of our undated map units. Robert Blodgett provided us with fossil identifications and supporting discussions. Melanie Werdon and De Anne Stevens gave timely and constructive reviews. We appreciate the warm hospitality and logistical support of Jessi Braga and Stephan Lake Lodge, and we thank Alpine Air Alaska pilots Martin Hoessinger and Jared Berman for skilled and safe flying.

  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?

    Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys
    GIS Manager
    3354 College Road
    Fairbanks, AK 99709-3707
    USA

    (907)451-5020 (voice)
    dggsgis@alaska.gov

    Hours_of_Service: 8 am to 4:30 pm, Monday through Friday, except State holidays


Why was the data set created?

The Alaska Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys (DGGS) initiated a multi-year project to improve the understanding of mineral potential in western Wrangellia. The project began in 2013 with acquisition of magnetic and electromagnetic (EM) geophysical data over unsurveyed portions of the terrane in the Clearwater and Talkeetna Mountains. DGGS geologists completed a three week field program of geologic mapping, rock, and stream sediment sampling in 2013, and followed up with 1:50,000-scale mapping of the Talkeetna Mountains C-4 Quadrangle during the 2014 field season.


How was the data set created?

  1. From what previous works were the data drawn?

    Burns, L.E. and others, 2014 (source 1 of 4)
    Burns, L.E., Geoterrex-Dighem, WGM, Inc., Emond, A.M., and Graham, G.R.C., 2014, Iron Creek airborne electromagnetic and magnetic geophysical survey data compilation: Geophysical Report GPR 2014-6, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Type_of_Source_Media: digital data
    Source_Contribution: bedrock geologic interpretation

    Clautice, K.H. and others, 2001 (source 2 of 4)
    Clautice, K.H., Newberry, R.J., Blodgett, R.B., Bundtzen, T.K., Gage, B.G., Harris, E.E., Liss, S.A., Miller, M.L., Reifenstuhl, R.R., Clough, J.G., and Pinney, D.S., 2001, Bedrock geologic map of the Chulitna region, southcentral Alaska: Report of Investigation RI 2001-1A, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 31 p., 1 sheet, scale 1:63,360
    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 63360
    Source_Contribution: bedrock geologic interpretation

    Schmidt, J.M. and others, 2003, p. 101-108 (source 3 of 4)
    Schmidt, J.M., Werdon, M.B., and Wardlaw, Bruce, 2003, New mapping near Iron Creek, Talkeetna Mountains, indicates presence of Nikolai greenstone: Professional Report PR 120J, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: p. 101-108
    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Contribution: bedrock geologic interpretation

    Werdon, M.B. and others, 2002 (source 4 of 4)
    Werdon, M.B., Riehle, J.R., Schmidt, J.M., Newberry, R.J., and Pessel, G.H., 2002, Geologic map of the Iron Creek area, Talkeetna Mountains B-5 Quadrangle, Alaska: Preliminary Interpretive Report PIR 2002-4, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 1 sheet, scale 1:63,360
    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 63360
    Source_Contribution: bedrock geologic interpretation

  2. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?

    Date: 2014 (process 1 of 3)
    Bedrock geologic interpretation - In 2014, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys (DGGS) bedrock geologists traversed and collected rock samples throughout a 450-square-mile area about 50 miles east of the town of Talkeetna. This work was integrated with findings from 2013 fieldwork in the western Wrangellia terrane, geophysical surveys of the area, and with existing literature and unpublished DGGS mapping conducted during the mid-80s. Geologists observed details about the variations in texture, lithology and orientation of the map units and collected rock samples, noted outcrop descriptions, and conducted structural measurements. Selected samples were submitted for geochronologic and geochemical analysis and the results were used to further interpret the stratigraphic and structural history of the map area. A complete list of references can be found in the accompanying report.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • Burns, L.E. and others, 2014
    • Clautice, K.H. and others, 2001
    • Schmidt, J.M. and others, 2003, p. 101-108
    • Werdon, M.B. and others, 2002

    Date: 2014 (process 2 of 3)
    Surficial geologic interpretation - Reconnaissance surficial geologic field work was conducted during the summer of 2014. Observations of river banks and deposits, debris flow deposits, glacial deposits and features, and lake and swamp deposits were recorded for use during subsequent interpretation of false-color infrared aerial photographs.

    Date: 2015 (process 3 of 3)
    Digitization of geologic map data - Field observations and rock sample descriptions were compiled into an ArcGIS geodatabase. The observation records were organized and attributed according to the NCGMP09 geodatabase standard. Bedrock point data of locations of structural observations (strike, dip, cleavage, jointing, etc.) were intersected with the surficial-geologic polygons in order to identify locations that were mapped as surficial materials based on aerial photography but were found to have small exposures that were desirable to be mapped as bedrock. These areas were then modified in the surficial-geologic polygons to be areas of bedrock exposure. Waterbody lines and polygons were digitized from the underlying topographic base-maps and incorporated into the geodatabase.

  3. What similar or related data should the user be aware of?

    Benowitz, J.A., Layer, P.W., Wypych, Alicja, and Twelker, Evan, 2015, 40Ar/39Ar data from the Talkeetna Mountains C-4 Quadrangle and adjoining areas, central Alaska: Raw Data File RDF 2015-10, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 19 p
    Benowitz, J.A., Layer, P.W., and Twelker, Evan, 2014, 40Ar/39Ar data from rocks collected in 2013 in the Wrangellia mineral assessment area, Gulkana, Healy, Mount Hayes, and Talkeetna Mountains quadrangles, Alaska: Raw Data File RDF 2014-18, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 10 p
    Twelker, Evan, Bachmann, E.N., Freeman, L.K., Newberry, R.J., Reioux, D.A., Sicard, K.R., Tuzzolino, A.L., Wright, T.C., and Wypych, Alicja, 2014, Major-oxide, minor-oxide, and trace-element geochemical data from rocks and stream sediments in the Wrangellia mineral assessment area, Gulkana, Healy, Mount Hayes, and Talkeetna Mountains quadrangles, Alaska: Raw Data File RDF 2014-3, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 6 p
    Twelker, Evan, Newberry, R.J., Freeman, L.K., Sicard, K.R., Reioux, D.A., and Bachmann, E.N., 2013, DGGS geologic and mineral-resource assessment of the western Wrangellia terrane, central Alaska: Initial progress report (presentation): Alaska Miners Association Annual Convention, Anchorage, Alaska, November 4-10, 2013: Poster and Presentation Twelker, Evan and others, 2013, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 25 p
    Twelker, Evan, Wypych, Alicja, Sicard, K.R., Newberry, R.J., Freeman, L.K., Reioux, D.A., and Lande, Lauren, 2014, Preliminary results from 2014 geologic mapping in the Talkeetna Mountains, Alaska (presentation): Alaska Miners Association Annual Convention, Anchorage, Alaska, November 3-9, 2014: Poster and Presentation Twelker, Evan and others, 2014, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 28 p
    Twelker, Evan, Wypych, Alicja, and Newberry, R.J., 2014, New Data and Insight on the Late Triassic Wrangellia Magmatic Ni-Cu-Co-PGE System in the Talkeetna Mountains, Central Alaska (poster): Society of Economic Geologists 2014 Conference, September 27-30, 2014: Poster and Presentation Twelker, Evan and others, 2014, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 1 sheet
    Twelker, Evan, and Burns, L.E., 2014, New geochemical and geophysical data from the western Wrangellia minerals assessment area (presentation): Alaska Miners Association 24th Biennial Mining Conference, Fairbanks, Alaska April 7-13, 2014: Poster and Presentation Twelker, Evan and Burns, L.E., 2014, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 34 p
    Wypych, Alicja, Twelker, Evan, Freeman, L.K., Lande, Lauren, Newberry, R.J., Reioux, D.A., and Sicard, K.R., 2014, Major-oxide and trace-element geochemical data from rocks collected in 2014 in the Wrangellia mineral assessment area, Talkeetna Mountains C-4, C-3, and B-4 quadrangles, Alaska: Raw Data File RDF 2014-22, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 4 p


How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?

  1. How well have the observations been checked?

    Certainty in identification of the map units varies due to the scale and interpretive nature of the mapping. The geologic unit interpretations and boundaries presented in this map result from interpretation of false-color infrared aerial photographs, investigative traverses throughout the map area, aerial reconnaissance via helicopter, examination of exposures, geochemistry and geochronology analysis, and interpretation of geophysical survey data. The air-photo interpretations were adjusted as needed to be consistent with bedrock exposures identified by field geologists. Per NCGMP09 (USGS National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program - Draft Standard Format for Digital Publication of Geologic Maps) specifications, the authors have assigned a confidence value to each polygon and line segment to indicate their degree of confidence in the positioning and identification of the element at the mapped scale. This publication is a PRELIMINARY INTERPRETIVE REPORT and is meant to allow rapid release of field observations or initial interpretations of geology or analytical data. It has not undergone formal peer review. Interpretations or conclusions contained in this publication are subject to change.

  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?

    Mappers recorded observations on 1:63,360 scale (nominal) color-infrared aerial photographs and 1:63,360 scale USGS topographic base maps. The authors believe the total horizontal accuracy of directly observed mapped geologic contacts is on the order of 25 m or better, with somewhat lesser accuracy expected in areas of rugged relief. Per NCGMP09 specifications, the authors have assigned a confidence value to each polygon, line, or point to indicate their degree of confidence in the positioning and identification of the element at the mapped scale. Waterlines and waterbody polygons were entirely derived from topographic base maps, consequently it is possible that the mapped location and extent of these features may differ from modern ground conditions.

  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?

  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?

    This report and digital dataset provides information about geologic features that can be identified or interpreted at a scale of 1:50,000. Relative to preexisting mapping, it offers an improved understanding of the geology, structural history, and mineral potential of the area. However, significant additional work would be required to fully resolve uncertainties in our interpretations.

  5. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?

    Polygon topology was implemented per NCGMP09 specifications (polygons must not overlap, polygons must not have gaps, boundaries must be overlain by lines in ContactsAndFaults). All polygon features were topologically validated using ArcGIS for Desktop prior to export to shapefile format.


How can someone get a copy of the data set?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?

Access_Constraints:
This report, map, and/or dataset is available directly from the State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys (see contact information below).
Use_Constraints:
Any hard copies or published datasets utilizing these datasets shall clearly indicate their source. If the user has modified the data in any way, the user is obligated to describe the types of modifications the user has made. The user specifically agrees not to misrepresent these datasets, nor to imply that changes made by the user were approved by the State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys. The State of Alaska makes no express or implied warranties (including warranties for merchantability and fitness) with respect to the character, functions, or capabilities of the electronic data or products or their appropriateness for any user's purposes. In no event will the State of Alaska be liable for any incidental, indirect, special, consequential, or other damages suffered by the user or any other person or entity whether from the use of the electronic services or products or any failure thereof or otherwise. In no event will the State of Alaska's liability to the Requestor or anyone else exceed the fee paid for the electronic service or product.

  1. Who distributes the data set? (Distributor 1 of 1)

    Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys
    3354 College Road
    Fairbanks, AK 99709-3707
    USA

    (907)451-5020 (voice)
    (907)451-5050 (FAX)
    dggspubs@alaska.gov

    Hours_of_Service: 8 am to 4:30 pm, Monday through Friday, except State holidays
    Contact_Instructions:
    Please view our website (<http://www.dggs.alaska.gov>) for the latest information on available data. Please contact us using the e-mail address provided above when possible.
  2. What's the catalog number I need to order this data set?

    PIR 2015-6

  3. What legal disclaimers am I supposed to read?

    The State of Alaska makes no expressed or implied warranties (including warranties for merchantability and fitness) with respect to the character, functions, or capabilities of the electronic data or products or their appropriateness for any user's purposes. In no event will the State of Alaska be liable for any incidental, indirect, special, consequential, or other damages suffered by the user or any other person or entity whether from the use of the electronic services or products or any failure thereof or otherwise. In no event will the State of Alaska's liability to the Requestor or anyone else exceed the fee paid for the electronic service or product.

  4. How can I download or order the data?


Who wrote the metadata?

Dates:
Last modified: 14-Sep-2015
Metadata author:
Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys
Metadata Manager
3354 College Road
Fairbanks, AK 99709-3707
USA

(907)451-5020 (voice)

Metadata standard:
FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (FGDC-STD-001-1998)
Metadata extensions used:


Generated by mp version 2.9.21 on Mon Sep 14 09:50:42 2015