sbet: Smoothed Best Estimate Trajectory shapefile
Hubbard, T.D., Koehler, R.D., and Combellick, R.A., 2011, High-resolution lidar data for Alaska infrastructure corridors: Raw Data File RDF 2011-3, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, AK, USA.Online Links:
This is a point data set.
The map projection used is Alaska Albers Equal Area Conic.
Planar coordinates are encoded using coordinate pair
Abscissae (x-coordinates) are specified to the nearest 0.000001
Ordinates (y-coordinates) are specified to the nearest 0.000001
Planar coordinates are specified in meters
The horizontal datum used is North American Datum of 1983.
The ellipsoid used is Geodetic Reference System 80.
The semi-major axis of the ellipsoid used is 6378137.
The flattening of the ellipsoid used is 1/298.257222.
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 56.50408 |
Maximum: | 604792.57899 |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 18.837 |
Maximum: | 5159.32 |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | -41.478219 |
Maximum: | 38.613914 |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | -33.227986 |
Maximum: | 22.134247 |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | -179.999985 |
Maximum: | 179.999816 |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | -97.92675781 |
Maximum: | 94.57273102 |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | -91.3674469 |
Maximum: | 111.9095993 |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | -20.27645302 |
Maximum: | 23.23749542 |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 0.003 |
Maximum: | 0.036 |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 0.003 |
Maximum: | 0.032 |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 0.005 |
Maximum: | 0.047 |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 2.2 |
Maximum: | 17.8 |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 2.2 |
Maximum: | 20.1 |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 3.5 |
Maximum: | 158.8 |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 0.001 |
Maximum: | 0.006 |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 0.001 |
Maximum: | 0.008 |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 0.001 |
Maximum: | 0.006 |
Data collection was supported by funding from the Department of Natural Resources (DNR), Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys (DGGS), the Alaska Gas Pipeline Project Office, the Office of the Federal Coordinator, and the Alaska Gasline Development Corporation (AGDC). Lidar data were collected and processed by Watershed Sciences, Inc. of Corvallis, OR. Survey data were collected by McClintock Land Associates of Eagle River, AK. Lidar data and derivative products were checked for quality, completeness, and accuracy by State of Oregon Department of Geology & Mineral Industries based in Portland, OR.
(907)451-5029 (voice)
dggsgis@alaska.gov
Provide aircraft position and attitude during acquisition of lidar data.
Lidar survey datasets were referenced to the 1 Hz static ground GPS data collected over pre-surveyed monuments with known coordinates. While surveying, the aircraft collected 2 Hz kinematic GPS data, and the on-board inertial measurement unit (IMU) collected 200 Hz aircraft attitude data. Waypoint GPS v.8.10 was used to process the kinematic corrections for the aircraft. The static and kinematic GPS data were then post-processed after the survey to obtain an accurate GPS solution and aircraft positions. IPAS v.1.35 was used to develop a trajectory file that includes corrected aircraft position and attitude information. The trajectory data for the entire flight survey session were incorporated into a final smoothed best estimated trajectory (SBET) file that contains accurate and continuous aircraft positions and attitudes.
The positional coordinates and attitude of the aircraft were recorded continuously throughout the lidar collection mission. Aircraft position was measured twice per second (2 Hz) by an on-board differential GPS unit during periods with PDOP less than or equal to 3 and with at least 6 satellites in view. Aircraft position was measured twice per second (200 Hz) as pitch, roll and yaw (heading) from an on-board inertial measurement unit (IMU). To allow for post-processing correction and calibration, aircraft/sensor position and attitude are indexed by GPS time. During the lidar survey, static (1 Hz recording frequency) ground surveys were conducted over the survey control monuments. All control monuments were observed for a minimum of two survey sessions lasting no fewer than 4 hours. At the beginning of every session, the tripod and antenna were reset. Indexed by time, GPS data were used to correct the continuous on-board measurements of aircraft position recorded throughout the mission. Control monuments were located within 13 nautical miles of the survey area.
The positional coordinates and attitude of the aircraft were recorded continuously throughout the lidar collection mission. Aircraft position was measured twice per second (2 Hz) by an on-board differential GPS unit during periods with PDOP less than or equal to 3 and with at least 6 satellites in view. Aircraft position was measured twice per second (200 Hz) as pitch, roll and yaw (heading) from an on-board inertial measurement unit (IMU). To allow for post-processing correction and calibration, aircraft/sensor position and attitude are indexed by GPS time. During the lidar survey, static (1 Hz recording frequency) ground surveys were conducted over the survey control monuments. All control monuments were observed for a minimum of two survey sessions lasting no fewer than 4 hours. At the beginning of every session, the tripod and antenna were reset. Indexed by time, GPS data were used to correct the continuous on-board measurements of aircraft position recorded throughout the mission. Control monuments were located within 13 nautical miles of the survey area.
Lidar data have been checked for accuracy and completeness. Please refer to the lidar delivery report and lidar QC report for details about data accuracy completeness for individual delivery sets.
Consistency refers to lidar elevation differences between overlapping flight lines. Consistency errors are created by poor lidar system calibration settings associated with sensor platform mounting. Errors in consistency manifest as vertical offsets between individual flight lines. Consistency offsets were measured using the "Find Match" tool within the TerraMatch© software toolset. This tool uses aircraft trajectory information linked to the lidar point cloud data to quantify flight line-to-flight line offsets.
Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?
- Access_Constraints:
- This dataset is available directly from the State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys
- Use_Constraints:
- Any hard copies or published datasets utilizing these datasets shall clearly indicate their source. If the user has modified the data in any way, the user is obligated to describe the types of modifications the user has made. The user specifically agrees not to misrepresent these datasets, nor to imply that changes made by the user were approved by the State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys. The State of Alaska makes no express or implied warranties (including warranties for merchantability and fitness) with respect to the character, functions, or capabilities of the electronic data or products or their appropriateness for any user's purposes. In no event will the State of Alaska be liable for any incidental, indirect, special, consequential, or other damages suffered by the user or any other person or entity whether from the use of the electronic services or products or any failure thereof or otherwise. In no event will the State of Alaska's liability to the Requestor or anyone else exceed the fee paid for the electronic service or product.
(907)451-5020 (voice)
(907)451-5050 (FAX)
dggspubs@alaska.gov
RDF 2011-3
The State of Alaska makes no express or implied warranties (including warranties of merchantability and fitness) with respect to the character, function, or capabilities of the electronic services or products or their appropriateness for any user's purposes. In no event will the State of Alaska be liable for any incidental, indirect, special, consequential, or other damages suffered by the user or any other person or entity, whether from the use of the electronic services or products, any failure thereof, or otherwise, and in no event will the State of Alaska's liability to the requestor or anyone else exceed the fee paid for the electronic service or product.
Current publication is not available on paper. To purchase other printed reports and maps, contact DGGS by phone (907-451-5020), e-mail (dggspubs@alaska.gov), or fax (907-451-5050). Payment accepted: Cash, check, money order, VISA, or MasterCard.
Data format: | vector digital data |
---|---|
Network links: |
<http://dx.doi.org/10.14509/22722> |
(907)451-5020 (voice)