Zircon U-Pb age data, Ray Mountains area, Bettles Quadrangle, Alaska

Metadata also available as - [Parseable text] - [XML]

Frequently anticipated questions:


What does this data set describe?

Title:
Zircon U-Pb age data, Ray Mountains area, Bettles Quadrangle, Alaska
Abstract:
U-Pb analyses were performed on igneous rocks from the Ray Mountains area of west-central Alaska. These new age analyses will allow us to better evaluate the geochronology of the granitic rocks that are the apparent source of the alluvial REE and tin resources. The plutonic samples have ages ranging from 98.0 +/- 0.9 Ma to 111.6 +/- 1.0 Ma. The sample location coordinates and analytical data tables associated with this report are available in digital format as comma-separated value (CSV) files.
Supplemental_Information:
border:    Outline of the study area.
geochron-data:    geochronology lab files and applicable documentation.
geochron-summary:    Identification numbers, coordinates, sample descriptions, and summary ages of each sample.
  1. How should this data set be cited?

    Tuzzolino, A.L., O'Sullivan, P.B., Freeman, L.K., and Newberry, R.J., 2016, Zircon U-Pb age data, Ray Mountains area, Bettles Quadrangle, Alaska: Raw Data File RDF 2016-7, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 19 p.

  2. What geographic area does the data set cover?

    West_Bounding_Coordinate: -150.502600
    East_Bounding_Coordinate: -150.047000
    North_Bounding_Coordinate: 66.511910
    South_Bounding_Coordinate: 66.054390

  3. What does it look like?

  4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?

    Beginning_Date: 2012
    Ending_Date: 2016
    Currentness_Reference: ground condition

  5. What is the general form of this data set?

    Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: report and digital data

  6. How does the data set represent geographic features?

    1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?

      This is a point data set.

    2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?

      Horizontal positions are specified in geographic coordinates, that is, latitude and longitude. Latitudes are given to the nearest 0.00001. Longitudes are given to the nearest 0.00001. Latitude and longitude values are specified in decimal degrees.

      The horizontal datum used is World Geodetic System of 1984.
      The ellipsoid used is WGS 84.
      The semi-major axis of the ellipsoid used is 6378137.
      The flattening of the ellipsoid used is 1/298.257223563.

  7. How does the data set describe geographic features?

    rdf2016-7-border.shp
    Outline of the study area. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys (DGGS))

    rdf2016-7-geochron-data
    Geochronology lab files and applicable documentation. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys (DGGS))

    rdf2016-7-geochron-summary.csv
    Identification numbers, coordinates, sample descriptions, and summary ages of each sample. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys (DGGS))

    SAMPLE
    Label assigned in the field to identify the sample. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    Generic example of a sample identifier: YYYYAAA9999X: YYYY= four digits of year, AAA=geologist's initials (one to three characters), 999=unique station number, X= optional alpha character which indicates that multiple samples were collected at a given location or that multiple observations were recorded in the project database.

    LAB_SAMPLE_NUMBER
    Label used by the lab to identify the sample. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys and Apatite to Zircon, Inc. (A2Z))

    The lab sample number is typically identical to the field sample number. However, in some cases, the sample number provided to the lab does differ from the number assigned in the field. We provide both numbers to document instances in which the sample numbers in the lab files differ from the field sample number.

    LATITUDE
    Latitude, WGS84 (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    Range of values
    Minimum:66.05439
    Maximum:66.51191
    Units:decimal degrees

    LONGITUDE
    Longitude, WGS84 (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    Range of values
    Minimum:-150.5026
    Maximum:-150.047
    Units:decimal degrees

    MAP_UNIT
    The type of rock that was dated. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    The rock we sampled were collected from: Kgr - Kanuti Pluton, Kgr - Hot Springs Pluton, Kgr - Ray River Pluton, and Kgr - No Name Creek Pluton units.

    DESCRIPTION
    Description of the sample (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

    A brief sample and/or station description.

    NUM_MEASUREMENTS_USED_WMEAN_AGE
    Number of measurements used for calculating the weighted mean age. (Source: Apatite to Zircon, Inc. (A2Z))

    Range of values
    Minimum:46
    Maximum:55

    NUM_MEASUREMENTS_USED_MEAN_CONCORDIA_AGE
    Number of measurements used for calculating the mean concordia age. (Source: Apatite to Zircon, Inc. (A2Z))

    Range of values
    Minimum:17
    Maximum:26

    TOTAL_MEASUREMENTS
    Total number of measurements. (Source: Apatite to Zircon, Inc. (A2Z))

    Range of values
    Minimum:60
    Maximum:60

    WMEAN_AGE_MA
    Weighted mean age, in millions of years (Ma). (Source: Apatite to Zircon, Inc. (A2Z))

    Range of values
    Minimum:98.6
    Maximum:111.7
    Units:Ma

    2_SD_WMEAN_AGE
    2-sigma standard deviation on the weighted mean age. (Source: Apatite to Zircon, Inc. (A2Z))

    Range of values
    Minimum:1
    Maximum:1.3

    MEAN_CONCORDIA_AGE_MA
    Mean concordia age, in millions of years (Ma). (Source: Apatite to Zircon, Inc. (A2Z))

    Range of values
    Minimum:98
    Maximum:111.6
    Units:Ma

    2_SD_MEAN_CONCORDIA_AGE
    2-sigma standard deviation on the mean concordia age. (Source: Apatite to Zircon, Inc. (A2Z))

    Range of values
    Minimum:0.9
    Maximum:1.3


Who produced the data set?

  1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)

  2. Who also contributed to the data set?

    This project was funded by the Alaska State Legislature through the Strategic and Critical Minerals Assessment project, a constituent of the Alaska Airborne Geophysical/Geological Mineral Inventory program. Samples in this report were collected by Rainer Newberry, Amy Tuzzolino, and Colby Wright of the University of Alaska Fairbanks. Margaret Donelick (A2Z) provided technical assistance with sample preparation; Paul O'Sullivan and Ray Donelick (A2Z), as well as Rainer Newberry and Alicja Wypych (DGGS), provided assistance with LA-ICP-MS data interpretation.

  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?

    Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys
    GIS Manager
    3354 College Rd
    Fairbanks, AK 99709-3707
    USA

    907-451-5020 (voice)
    dggsgis@alaska.gov

    Hours_of_Service: 8 am to 4:30 pm, Monday through Friday, except State holidays


Why was the data set created?

DGGS conducted a multi-year project, from 2012 through 2013, to study the geology and economic potential of rare-earth elements (REE) and other metals in the Ray Mountains in the Beaver, Bettles, Livengood, and Tanana quadrangles. To better understand the granitic rocks that are associated with REE and tin-polymetallic occurrences in the area, four samples were collected for U-Pb geochronologic analyses. These new age analyses will allow us to better evaluate the geochronology of the granitic rocks that are the apparent source of the alluvial REE and tin resources.


How was the data set created?

  1. From what previous works were the data drawn?

    Barker, J.C. and Foley, J.Y., 1986 (source 1 of 2)
    Barker, J.C., and Foley, J.Y., 1986, Tin reconnaissance of the Kanuti and Hodzana Rivers uplands, central Alaska: Information Circular IC 9104, U.S. Bureau of Mines, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 27 p
    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Contribution: fieldwork

    Miller, T.P., 1989 (source 2 of 2)
    Miller, T.P., 1989, Contrasting Plutonic Rock Suites of the Yukon-Koyukuk basin and the Ruby Geanticline, Alaska: null v. 94, no. B11, American Geophysical Union, USA.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Contribution: fieldwork

  2. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?

    Date: 2013 (process 1 of 3)
    Fieldwork - DGGS field geologists collected rock samples from the surface or within 0.5 m of the surface. Care was taken to collect fresh, unweathered rock samples representative of igneous rock types in the map area. Locations were recorded using handheld, WAAS-enabled GPS devices. WAAS-enabled GPS devices have a reported error of about 1 m. Depending on degradation of the WAAS and GPS signals, the horizontal position error of sample locations in this report is in the range of 1-10 m. The originating coordinate system for samples collected in 2012 (2012CW033A, 2012RN364A and 2012RN418A) was NAD27, UTM zone 5. Sample 2013AT135A was collected using WGS1984 Web Mercator Auxiliary Sphere coordinate system as specified by the settings of the collectors used. To provide a consistent coordinate system for all samples, all location coordinates of the samples collected in 2012 were transformed to WGS1984 Web Mercator Auxiliary Sphere using NAD_1927_To_NAD_1983_Alaska+WGS_1984_(ITRF00)_To_NAD_1983 transformation.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • Barker, J.C. and Foley, J.Y., 1986
    • Miller, T.P., 1989

    Date: 2014 (process 2 of 3)
    Analytical methods - DGGS submitted selected rock samples to A2Z in 2014. Paul O'Sullivan directed the processing and analyses of the samples in the A2Z laboratory in Viola, Idaho, where laser-ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) analyses were performed on an Agilent 7700x quadrapole mass spectrometer attached to a Resonetics RESOlution M50 Excimer laser.

    Date: 2015 (process 3 of 3)
    U-pb data analysis - The raw data received from A2Z were reviewed and processed at DGGS. First, the failed and peak-background-corrected (pbc) analyses were excluded from the age calculations. These initial criteria are noted in the accompanying data tables for individual samples. Next, the analyses for each sample were plotted on concordia plots using Isoplot v. 3.7. In two cases, samples 2013AT135A and 2012RN418A, the datasets yielded poorly defined chords, with mid-Cretaceous lower intercepts and early Paleozoic to late Proterozoic upper intercepts. The data quality are not sufficient to use the ages so defined, but they do indicate a small amount of contamination from older, inherited zircon. To further reduce the data, the relative 206Pb/238U age error was calculated using the 206Pb/238U age and the quoted error (2sigma). All analyses with greater than 10 percent relative error were excluded. The excluded data consistently included those samples with anomalously old ages. Histograms of 206Pb/238U ages were constructed to identify age populations well outside of the means. For sample 2012RN418A, a single, anomalously old age was excluded. The mean error-weighted ages for the remaining 206Pb/238U ages were calculated. Next, the percent deviation from the concordia was calculated. The equation that was used calculates the extent that the measured 207Pb/235U deviates from the concordia, assuming the measured 206Pb/238U ratio lies on the concordia. In several cases, data that plots increasingly farther from the concordia gives increasingly older ages, again indicating a physical mixing of Pb and U from early Paleozoic to late Proterozoic and from Cretaceous zircon. Following the elimination of data deviating more than 2-3 percent from the concordia, a mean concordia age was calculated using Isoplot software. In general, the mean 206Pb/238U age and the mean concordia age are indistinguishable, within error, with a smaller error for the concordia age. The authors prefer the resulting mean concordia age, as generally having smaller error and fewer inherited components.

  3. What similar or related data should the user be aware of?

    Bachmann, E.N., Blessington, M.J., Freeman, L.K., Newberry, R.J., Tuzzolino, A.L., Wright, T.C., and Wylie, William, 2013, Geochemical major-oxide, minor-oxide, trace-element, and rare-earth-element data from rocks and stream sediments collected in 2012 in the Ray Mountains area, Beaver, Bettles, Livengood, and Tanana quadrangles, Alaska: Raw Data File RDF 2013-5, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 4 p
    Tuzzolino, A.L., Freeman, L.K., and Newberry, R.J., 2014, Geochemical major-oxide, minor-oxide, trace-element, and rare-earth-element data from rock samples collected in 2013 in the Ray Mountains area, Bettles A-1 and A-6 quadrangles, Alaska: Raw Data File RDF 2014-17, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 3 p


How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?

  1. How well have the observations been checked?

    This data is being released in the DGGS Raw Data File series. The information has been examined by several geologists familiar with the study area, but the data and accompanying report have not been reviewed for technical content or for conformity to the editorial standards of DGGS. Questions regarding the accuracy of information in the the A2Z data files can be best answered by the originating lab.

  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?

    Locations were recorded using handheld, WAAS-enabled GPS devices. WAAS-enabled GPS devices have a reported error of about 1 m (NSTB/WAAS T&E Team, 2006). Depending on degradation of the WAAS and GPS signals, the horizontal position error of sample locations in this report is in the range of 1-10 m. The originating coordinate system for samples collected in 2012 (2012CW033A, 2012RN364A and 2012RN418A) was NAD27, UTM zone 5. Sample 2013AT135A was collected using WGS1984 Web Mercator Auxiliary Sphere coordinate system as specified by the settings of the collectors used. To provide a consistent coordinate system for all samples, all location coordinates of the samples collected in 2012 were transformed to WGS1984 Web Mercator Auxiliary Sphere using NAD_1927_To_NAD_1983_Alaska+WGS_1984_(ITRF00)_To_NAD_1983 transformation.

  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?

  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?

    This data release is complete.

  5. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?

    not applicable


How can someone get a copy of the data set?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?

Access_Constraints:
This report, map, and/or dataset is available directly from the State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys (see contact information below).
Use_Constraints:
Any hard copies or published datasets utilizing these datasets shall clearly indicate their source. If the user has modified the data in any way, the user is obligated to describe the types of modifications the user has made. The user specifically agrees not to misrepresent these datasets, nor to imply that changes made by the user were approved by the State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys. The State of Alaska makes no express or implied warranties (including warranties for merchantability and fitness) with respect to the character, functions, or capabilities of the electronic data or products or their appropriateness for any user's purposes. In no event will the State of Alaska be liable for any incidental, indirect, special, consequential, or other damages suffered by the user or any other person or entity whether from the use of the electronic services or products or any failure thereof or otherwise. In no event will the State of Alaska's liability to the Requestor or anyone else exceed the fee paid for the electronic service or product.

  1. Who distributes the data set? (Distributor 1 of 1)

    Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys
    3354 College Road
    Fairbanks, AK 99709-3707
    USA

    (907)451-5020 (voice)
    (907)451-5050 (FAX)
    dggspubs@alaska.gov

    Hours_of_Service: 8 am to 4:30 pm, Monday through Friday, except State holidays
    Contact_Instructions:
    Please view our website (<http://www.dggs.alaska.gov>) for the latest information on available data. Please contact us using the e-mail address provided above when possible.
  2. What's the catalog number I need to order this data set?

    RDF 2016-7

  3. What legal disclaimers am I supposed to read?

    The State of Alaska makes no expressed or implied warranties (including warranties for merchantability and fitness) with respect to the character, functions, or capabilities of the electronic data or products or their appropriateness for any user's purposes. In no event will the State of Alaska be liable for any incidental, indirect, special, consequential, or other damages suffered by the user or any other person or entity whether from the use of the electronic services or products or any failure thereof or otherwise. In no event will the State of Alaska's liability to the Requestor or anyone else exceed the fee paid for the electronic service or product.

  4. How can I download or order the data?


Who wrote the metadata?

Dates:
Last modified: 12-May-2016
Metadata author:
Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys
Metadata Manager
3354 College Road
Fairbanks, AK 99709-3707
USA

(907)451-5020 (voice)

Metadata standard:
FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (FGDC-STD-001-1998)
Metadata extensions used:


Generated by mp version 2.9.21 on Thu May 12 11:02:36 2016