Photogrammetric digital surface models and mosaiced orthoimagery for Barter Island, Alaska

Metadata also available as - [Parseable text] - [XML]

Frequently anticipated questions:


What does this data set describe?

Title:
Photogrammetric digital surface models and mosaiced orthoimagery for Barter Island, Alaska
Abstract:
In 2017, the National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Geodetic Survey, Remote Sensing Division (RSD) performed extensive aerial collection of imagery along Alaska's northeastern coastline in support of NOAA's Coastal Mapping Program. Data collected under this initiative are typically used to improve maritime chart products, serve as a baseline for shoreline change monitoring, and update the national shoreline database. This report summarizes photogrammetric digital surface models (DSMs) and an orthomosaic derived from this image dataset using Structure from Motion (SfM) techniques for the Barter Island area. Aerial images used to derive products described in this report were collected on July 19, 2017. Ground control points (GCPs) and checkpoints used for vertical correction and validation of this data were collected with Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) surveys by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) on September 4, 2014, and September 18, 2016. This data collection is being released as a Raw Data File with an open end-user license and includes the following for the Barter Island area: (1) orthomosaic raster, (2) DSM raster, (3) smoothed DSM raster, and (4) DSM hillshade. All files can be downloaded free of charge from the Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys website (<http://doi.org/10.14509/30456>).
Supplemental_Information:
digital surface model:    The DSM is a 1-band, 32-bit floating point integer raster file (file format GeoTIFF) with a GSD of 53 cm. DSM raster cell values represent elevation values at any given point. NoData values have been set to -3.40282346639e+038. The uncompressed file size is 2.16 GB.	
orthomosaic:    The orthomosaic is a 3-band, 8-bit unsigned integer raster file (red/green/blue; file format GeoTIFF) with a GSD of 26 cm (fig. 3A). NoData values for each band have been set to 0. The file employs Lempel-Ziv-Welch (LZW) compression and total uncompressed file size is 3.19 GB.	
smoothed digital surface model:    The smoothed DSM is a 1-band, 32-bit floating-point integer raster file (file format GeoTIFF) with a GSD of 53 cm. This DSM was created from a smoothed 3D mesh, rather than a dense point cloud. 3D mesh creation and subsequent smoothing were done in Agisoft Metashape. Smoothing here removes much of the inherent low-noise in surface features that exist in the normal DSM. DSM raster cell values represent elevation values at any given point. NoData values have been set to -3.40282346639e+038. The uncompressed file size is 1.42 GB.	
dsm hillshade:    The DSM hillshade is a 3-band, 8-bit unsigned integer raster file (red/green/blue; file format GeoTIFF) with a GSD of 53 cm. It represents hillshading of the unsmoothed DSM raster. NoData values have been set to 255. The file employs LZW compression. The hillshade was produced using the Image Analysis tools within ArcGIS Desktop (ArcMap 10.4). The uncompressed file size is 1.62 GB.
  1. How should this data set be cited?

    Escarzaga, Stephen, Kinsman, N.E.M., and Overbeck, J.R., 2020, Photogrammetric digital surface models and mosaiced orthoimagery for Barter Island, Alaska: Raw Data File RDF 2020-6, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 7 p.

  2. What geographic area does the data set cover?

    West_Bounding_Coordinate: -143.759258
    East_Bounding_Coordinate: -143.512518
    North_Bounding_Coordinate: 70.150798
    South_Bounding_Coordinate: 70.080458

  3. What does it look like?

  4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?

    Calendar_Date: 2017
    Currentness_Reference: ground condition

  5. What is the general form of this data set?

    Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: imagery

  6. How does the data set represent geographic features?

    1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?

      This is a raster data set.

    2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?

      Grid_Coordinate_System_Name: Universal Transverse Mercator
      Universal_Transverse_Mercator:
      UTM_Zone_Number: 7
      Transverse_Mercator:
      Scale_Factor_at_Central_Meridian: 0.999600
      Longitude_of_Central_Meridian: -141
      Latitude_of_Projection_Origin: 0
      False_Easting: 500000.000000
      False_Northing: 0

      Planar coordinates are encoded using coordinate pair
      Abscissae (x-coordinates) are specified to the nearest .00000001
      Ordinates (y-coordinates) are specified to the nearest .00000001
      Planar coordinates are specified in Meters

      The horizontal datum used is World Geodetic System of 1984.
      The ellipsoid used is WGS 84.
      The semi-major axis of the ellipsoid used is 6378137.
      The flattening of the ellipsoid used is 1/298.257223563000025.

      Vertical_Coordinate_System_Definition:
      Altitude_System_Definition:
      Altitude_Datum_Name: WGS84 Ellipsoid
      Altitude_Resolution: 53
      Altitude_Distance_Units: centimeters
      Altitude_Encoding_Method:
      Explicit elevation coordinate included with horizontal coordinates

  7. How does the data set describe geographic features?

    digital surface model
    The DSM is a 1-band, 32-bit floating point integer raster file (file format GeoTIFF) with a GSD of 53 cm. DSM raster cell values represent elevation values at any given point. NoData values have been set to -3.40282346639e+038. The uncompressed file size is 2.16 GB. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys (DGGS) and National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration)

    orthomosaic
    The orthomosaic is a 3-band, 8-bit unsigned integer raster file (red/green/blue; file format GeoTIFF) with a GSD of 26 cm (fig. 3A). NoData values for each band have been set to 0. The file employs Lempel-Ziv-Welch (LZW) compression and total uncompressed file size is 3.19 GB. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys and National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration)

    smoothed digital surface model
    The smoothed DSM is a 1-band, 32-bit floating-point integer raster file (file format GeoTIFF) with a GSD of 53 cm. This DSM was created from a smoothed 3D mesh, rather than a dense point cloud. 3D mesh creation and subsequent smoothing were done in Agisoft Metashape. Smoothing here removes much of the inherent low-noise in surface features that exist in the normal DSM. DSM raster cell values represent elevation values at any given point. NoData values have been set to -3.40282346639e+038. The uncompressed file size is 1.42 GB. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys (DGGS) and National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration)

    dsm hillshade
    The DSM hillshade is a 3-band, 8-bit unsigned integer raster file (red/green/blue; file format GeoTIFF) with a GSD of 53 cm. It represents hillshading of the unsmoothed DSM raster. NoData values have been set to 255. The file employs LZW compression. The hillshade was produced using the Image Analysis tools within ArcGIS Desktop (ArcMap 10.4). The uncompressed file size is 1.62 GB. (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys and National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration)


Who produced the data set?

  1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)

  2. Who also contributed to the data set?

    This project is supported and monitored by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Cooperative Science Center for Earth System Sciences and Remote Sensing Technologies (NOAA-CESSRST) under the Cooperative Agreement Grant #NA16SEC4810008. The authors would like to thank The City College of New York, NOAA-CESSRST (aka CREST) program and NOAA Office of Education, Educational Partnership Program for full fellowship support of Stephen M. Escarzaga. Stephen M. Escarzaga would like to thank his advisor Craig Tweedie, NOAA mentors Nicole Kinsman, Jon Sellars, Jason Woolard with the National Geodetic Survey, and Ann Gibbs with the Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center of the USGS for their guidance and contributions to this work. Additional acknowledgments for technical guidance go to Jeff Sloan (USGS), John Warrick (USGS), Ben Jones (USGS), Tahzay Jones and Chad Hults (NPS), Tom Noble, Gennady Gienko (UAF), and Mike R. James (Lancaster University). The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the funding agency or the U.S. Government. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the U.S. Government.

  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?

    Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys
    Metadata Manager
    3354 College Road
    Fairbanks, AK 99709-3707
    USA

    (907)451-5020 (voice)
    (907)451-5050 (FAX)
    dggspubs@alaska.gov

    Hours_of_Service: 8 am to 4:30 pm, Monday through Friday, except State holidays


Why was the data set created?

Alaska's extensive shorelines are incompletely mapped and poorly monitored for the evaluation of coastal dynamics. This publication was generated to support the Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys Coastal Hazards Program. The DGGS Coastal Hazards Program is engaged in ongoing investigations that will expand our understanding of how the coastline has evolved and how it will respond to hazardous events and long-term changes and is dedicated to fostering scientific partnerships that will improve the quality and quantity of the critical baseline data that are necessary to fuel informed decision-making throughout the state.


How was the data set created?

  1. From what previous works were the data drawn?

  2. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?

    Date: 2017 (process 1 of 2)
    Data acquisition - NOAA RSD collected aerial imagery over the Barter Island area on July 19, 2017, from a Beechcraft King Air 350CER aircraft flying at a nominal altitude of approximately 2,286 m above ground level (AGL), resulting in an average 26 cm ground sampling distance (GSD) in the images. While many areas surveyed under the NOAA NGS Coastal Mapping Program are done with single flight lines, RSD planned the Barter Island survey to include multiple parallel lines providing approximately 30 percent image sidelap; images were captured every approximately 8 to 9 seconds, producing approximately 60 percent image endlap. In addition to nadir scenes, RSD also collected oblique images with two additional cameras in the fore and aft positions mounted at approximately 33 degrees and approximately 36 degrees view angles, respectively. For the nadir, fore, and aft aircraft ports, Applanix DSS SN580 cameras with focal lengths of 51.542 mm, 60.202 mm, and 60.292 mm (respectively) collected 80.2 (nadir) and 39 (oblique) megapixel images in RAW format (table 1). Image capture between cameras was synchronized with each other and to an on-board Applanix POS/AV410 Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) and Inertial Measure Unit (IMU) system. The AeroAntenna GNSS antenna was mounted approximately 1.1 m above the camera ports.

    Date: 2017 (process 2 of 2)
    Data processing - Airborne GNSS and IMU data were processed using Applanix's PosPac MMS 8.0 commercial software by technicians and cartographers within RSD. Due to the remoteness of the survey area, a satellite-derived, real-time extended positioning method with no static base station was used for post-processing. Total Propagated Uncertainty for the resultant positional data is 66 cm. GPS data were adjusted to the World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS84) reference frame (mapping epoch of 2017.542466), and heights referenced to the Earth Gravitational Model of 1996 (EGM96). Photos were individually processed along with dark current images to remove inherent sensor noise. Raw images from the sensor (.RAW format) were processed to JPEG format to accommodate the transfer and subsequent SfM processing of this data. Batch color correction of oblique JPEGs was then conducted in Adobe Photoshop to more closely match the color profile of nadir images. Positional (latitude, longitude, height) and rotational (phi, kappa, omega) data from the on-board GPS/IMU system were supplied in additional metadata files, each pertaining to a specific camera location and rotation in space and time. These data fields were programmatically copied from the metadata documents into one camera external orientation file used in SfM processing within Agisoft Metashape Professional. Orthometric camera heights in the external orientation file were converted to ellipsoidal heights (WGS84) using NOAA's VDatum conversion tool. A total of 144 images were used in the SfM processing (50 nadir and 94 oblique), in which computer vision algorithms create a three-dimensional terrain model from overlapping sections of image data. The final orthomosaic is a result of orthometric correction of the images using this terrain model and a subsequent mosaicking of these orthoimages.

  3. What similar or related data should the user be aware of?


How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?

  1. How well have the observations been checked?

    Ground control points (GCPs) were supplied by the USGS Pacific Coastal & Marine Science Center from field reconnaissance on September 4, 2014 and September 18, 2016 with an Ashtech Z-Extreme GNSS system. A subset of 200 GCPs were used to evaluate these photogrammetric products, with 100 used to determine a mean vertical offset (as control) and 100 to determine residual error after vertical transformation (as checkpoints). Of this subset, only two GCPs were photo-identifiable. All products were visually inspected for data errors such as pits, border artifacts, and shifting.

  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?

    Due to the lack of photo-identifiable GCPs, no horizontal transformation has been applied to the data. However, in the two locations where these GCPs exist, the orthomosaic showed an estimated 20 cm and 25 cm offset respectively in the Easting direction.

  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?

    Vertical accuracy was determined for both the smoothed and unsmoothed DSMs. Accuracies were determined by calculating the mean vertical offset between DSMs and 100 GCPs, reducing this mean offset to zero by applying a vertical transformation and then determining a vertical Root Mean Square Error (RMSEz) for the transformed surfaces using the 100 checkpoints. The unsmoothed DSM had a mean vertical offset of +5 cm, and the final unsmoothed DSM had an RSMEz of 13.7 cm with +/- one standard deviation of 11.3 cm; 95% of checkpoints fell within 26 cm. The smoothed DSM had a mean vertical offset of +8 cm and the final smoothed DSM had an RMSEz of 13.3 cm with +/- one standard deviation of 8.5 cm; 95 percent of checkpoints fell within 28 cm. A table of checkpoints and errors is provided in the accompanying report.

  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?

    Due to the orientation and QA/QC of raw images, there is a stript of data missing from both the orthomosaic and DSM on the west side of the island. This data release is complete.

  5. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?

    The tests and processing methods used to ensure data consistency are described in the accompanying report.


How can someone get a copy of the data set?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?

Access_Constraints:
This report, map, and/or dataset is available directly from the State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys (see contact information below).
Use_Constraints:
Any hard copies or published datasets utilizing these datasets shall clearly indicate their source. If the user has modified the data in any way, the user is obligated to describe the types of modifications the user has made. The user specifically agrees not to misrepresent these datasets, nor to imply that changes made by the user were approved by the State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys. The State of Alaska makes no express or implied warranties (including warranties for merchantability and fitness) with respect to the character, functions, or capabilities of the electronic data or products or their appropriateness for any user's purposes. In no event will the State of Alaska be liable for any incidental, indirect, special, consequential, or other damages suffered by the user or any other person or entity whether from the use of the electronic services or products or any failure thereof or otherwise. In no event will the State of Alaska's liability to the Requestor or anyone else exceed the fee paid for the electronic service or product.

  1. Who distributes the data set? (Distributor 1 of 1)

    Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys
    Metadata Manager
    3354 College Road
    Fairbanks, AK 99709-3707
    USA

    (907)451-5020 (voice)
    (907)451-5050 (FAX)
    dggspubs@alaska.gov

    Hours_of_Service: 8 am to 4:30 pm, Monday through Friday, except State holidays
  2. What's the catalog number I need to order this data set?

    RDF 2020-6

  3. What legal disclaimers am I supposed to read?

    The State of Alaska makes no expressed or implied warranties (including warranties for merchantability and fitness) with respect to the character, functions, or capabilities of the electronic data or products or their appropriateness for any user's purposes. In no event will the State of Alaska be liable for any incidental, indirect, special, consequential, or other damages suffered by the user or any other person or entity whether from the use of the electronic services or products or any failure thereof or otherwise. In no event will the State of Alaska's liability to the Requestor or anyone else exceed the fee paid for the electronic service or product.

  4. How can I download or order the data?


Who wrote the metadata?

Dates:
Last modified: 05-Jun-2020
Metadata author:
Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys
Attn: Simone Montayne
Metadata Manager
3354 College Road
Fairbanks, AK 99709-3707
USA

(907)451-5020 (voice)
(907)451-5050 (FAX)
dggspubs@alaska.gov

Hours_of_Service: 8 am to 4:30 pm, Monday through Friday, except State holidays
Metadata standard:
FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (FGDC-STD-001-1998)
Metadata extensions used:


Generated by mp version 2.9.21 on Fri Jun 5 17:01:28 2020