Bedrock geologic map of the Ladue River-Mount Fairplay area, Tanacross and Nabesna quadrangles, Alaska

Metadata also available as - [Parseable text] - [XML]

Frequently anticipated questions:


What does this data set describe?

Title:
Bedrock geologic map of the Ladue River-Mount Fairplay area, Tanacross and Nabesna quadrangles, Alaska
Abstract:
The Mineral Resources section of the Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys (DGGS) conducted bedrock geologic mapping of a 4,800-sq-km (1,860-sq-mi) area of eastern Interior Alaska, including Mount Fairplay and the Ladue River drainage. The area lies north of the Alaska Highway and is approximately 65 km (40 mi) east of Tok, Alaska; it runs west from the Alaska-Yukon border to encompass the Taylor Highway. DGGS and the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) staff identified this area as having the potential to host deposits of critical minerals, including rare earth elements (REE), uranium, niobium, zirconium, tin, tungsten, bismuth, and rhenium, as well as conventional mineral resources including gold, copper, molybdenum, lead, zinc, and silver. Most of the known mineralization in the area is related to Cretaceous-Paleogene magmatism, which spans a broad diversity of compositions and ranges in scale from batholiths to shallowly emplaced dikes to volcanic rocks. The igneous rocks intrude a composite metamorphic province that includes both parautochthonous North America and components of the allochthonous Yukon Tanana Terrane, now juxtaposed against one another by Jurassic-Cretaceous low-angle faults and subsequently disrupted by multiple generations of Cretaceous-Cenozoic high-angle faults. Our map interpretation relies on observations of outcrop, subcrop, and float, and we make extensive use of airborne magnetic (Emond and others, 2015) and magnetic-electromagnetic surveys for interpolation between field stations. Our mapping of high-angle faults relies on tilt-derivative processing of aeromagnetic data, low resistivity anomalies in electromagnetic surveys, photo and topographic lineaments, and lithologic discontinuities between ridges. Rock names were assigned based on field and petrographic observations, modal-mineral percentages, and interpretations of geochemical data. Age determinations and interpretation of cross-cutting relationships were facilitated by 40Ar/39Ar and Zircon U-Pb geochronologic analysis. The complete report, geodatabase, and ESRI fonts and style files are available from the DGGS website: http://doi.org/10.14509/30735.
Supplemental_Information:
This geodatabase is organized according to the AK GeMS mapping schema Hendricks, M.D., Ekberg, P.G., Athey, J.E., Wyatt, W.C., Willingham, A.L., and Naibert, T.J., 2021, AK GeMS data dictionary: A description of the Alaska geologic mapping schema: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys Miscellaneous Publication 170, 10 p. https://doi.org/10.14509/30669. The distribution package includes ESRI fonts and style files, along with usage instructions. Further documentation of the symbology is provided by Ekberg, P.G., Hendricks, M.D., and Athey, J.E., 2021, AK GeMS symbology: A description of the AK GeMS style file: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys Miscellaneous Publication 169, 7 p. https://doi.org/10.14509/30584
  1. How might this data set be cited?
    Twelker, Evan, Newberry, R.J., Wypych, Alicja, Naibert, T.J., Wildland, A.D., Sicard, K.R., Regan, S.P., Athey, J.E., Wyatt, W.C., and Lopez, J.A., 2021, Bedrock geologic map of the Ladue River-Mount Fairplay area, Tanacross and Nabesna quadrangles, Alaska: Report of Investigation RI 2021-5A, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

  2. What geographic area does the data set cover?
    West_Bounding_Coordinate: -142.524398
    East_Bounding_Coordinate: -141.001318
    North_Bounding_Coordinate: 63.757486
    South_Bounding_Coordinate: 62.750135
  3. What does it look like?
  4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?
    Beginning_Date: 2019
    Ending_Date: 2021
    Currentness_Reference:
    ground condition
  5. What is the general form of this data set?
    Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: geodatabase
  6. How does the data set represent geographic features?
    1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?
      This is a vector data set.
    2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?
      Grid_Coordinate_System_Name: Universal Transverse Mercator
      Universal_Transverse_Mercator:
      UTM_Zone_Number: 7
      Transverse_Mercator:
      Scale_Factor_at_Central_Meridian: 0.999600
      Longitude_of_Central_Meridian: -141
      Latitude_of_Projection_Origin: 0
      False_Easting: 500000.000000
      False_Northing: 0
      Planar coordinates are encoded using coordinate pair
      Abscissae (x-coordinates) are specified to the nearest .00000001
      Ordinates (y-coordinates) are specified to the nearest .00000001
      Planar coordinates are specified in Meters
      The horizontal datum used is NAD83.
      The ellipsoid used is GRS 80.
      The semi-major axis of the ellipsoid used is 6378137.
      The flattening of the ellipsoid used is 1/298.257222101000025.
  7. How does the data set describe geographic features?
    eastern_tanacross_ak_gems_db_pkg
    Geodatabase, layer files, style files, and fonts (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)
    eastern_tanacross_fed_gems_db_pkg
    Geodatabase, layer files, style files, and fonts (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)
    eastern_tanacross_fed_gems_shapefile_pkg
    Shapefiles and open data files (Source: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys)

Who produced the data set?

  1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)
  2. Who also contributed to the data set?
    Cynthia Dusel-Bacon and Doug C. Kreiner reviewed the manuscript and provided constructive feedback for which we are most grateful. We also thank J.V. 'Jamey' Jones III for ongoing geological discussions and informal reviews. Donald L. Stevens and David A. Hedderly-Smith shared data and knowledge of the area. Charles G. 'Chip' Ireys oriented us to the Moosehorn area, and we also thank him for his hospitality during our three-week stay at his camp. Thanks to Keith Warren and Aurora Aviation for helicopter support, 40-Mile Air for logistical support, and to the Alaska Fire Service for their efforts protecting our camp during the 2019 McArthur Creek fire. We are grateful to have had access to Doyon Limited lands within the study area, and we thank Doyon Vice President of Lands Jamie Marunde and consulting geologist Harold J. Noyes for their help in securing this permission. This project was jointly funded by the State of Alaska and the U.S. Geological Survey's Earth Mapping Resources Initiative (Earth MRI) through cooperative agreement G19AC00262. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Geological Survey. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey.
  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?
    Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys
    Metadata Manager
    3354 College Road
    Fairbanks, AK
    USA

    (907)451-5020 (voice)
    (907)451-5050 (FAX)
    dggspubs@alaska.gov
    Hours_of_Service: 8 am to 4:30 pm, Monday through Friday, except State holidays
    Contact_Instructions:
    Please view our website (https://www.dggs.alaska.gov) for the latest information on available data. Please contact us using the e-mail address provided above when possible.

Why was the data set created?

The Ladue River-Mount Fairplay area, Tanacross and Nabesna quadrangles, Alaska is identified by DGGS and the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) staff as having the potential to host deposits of critical minerals, including rare earth elements (REE), uranium, niobium, zirconium, tin, tungsten, bismuth, and rhenium, as well as conventional mineral resources including gold, copper, molybdenum, lead, zinc, and silver. This map and accompanying report provide the modern geologic mapping and supporting data to promote mineral discovery in eastern Interior Alaska.

How was the data set created?

  1. From what previous works were the data drawn?
    Burns, L.E. and others, 2020 (source 1 of 10)
    Burns, L.E., Graham, G.R.C., Emond, A.M., Stevens Exploration Management Corp., and Surveys, Fugro Airborne, 2020, Alaska Highway corridor electromagnetic and magnetic airborne geophysical survey data compilation: Geophysical Report GPR 2020-15, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 17 p
    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Contribution: Bedrock geologic mapping
    Ekberg, P.G. and others, 2021 (source 2 of 10)
    Ekberg, P.G., Hendricks, M.D., and Athey, J.E., 2021, AK GeMS symbology: A description of the AK GeMS style file: Miscellaneous Publication MP 169, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 7 p
    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Contribution: GIS analysis and digital cartography
    Emond, A.M. and others, 2015 (source 3 of 10)
    Emond, A.M., Saltus, R.W., Graham, G.R.C., and Surveys, Goldak Airborne, 2015, Airborne magnetic geophysical survey of the Tanacross region, Alaska: Geophysical Report GPR 2015-6, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 12 p
    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Contribution: Bedrock geologic mapping
    Emond, A.M. and others, 2015 (source 4 of 10)
    Emond, A.M., Sicard, K.R., Jones, J.V., Saltus, R.W., Wypych, Alicja, and Twelker, Evan, 2015, Geophysical and geological investigations of the Tanacross region, Alaska (presentation): Alaska Miners Association Annual Convention, November 1-7, 2015: Poster and Presentation Emond, A.M. and others, 2015, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 46 p
    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Contribution: Bedrock geologic mapping
    Hendricks, M.D. and others, 2021 (source 5 of 10)
    Hendricks, M.D., Ekberg, P.G., Athey, J.E., Wyatt, W.C., Willingham, A.L., and Naibert, T.J., 2021, AK GeMS data dictionary: A description of the Alaska geologic mapping schema: Miscellaneous Publication MP 170, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 10 p
    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Contribution: GIS analysis and digital cartography
    Naibert, T.J. and others, 2020 (source 6 of 10)
    Naibert, T.J., Twelker, Evan, Wypych, Alicja, Athey, J.E., Newberry, R.J., Lopez, J.A., Regan, S.P., Sicard, K.R., Wildland, A.D., and Wyatt, W.C., 2020, Field station locations and magnetic susceptibility data collected in 2019 for the Eastern Tanacross Project, Tanacross and Nabesna quadrangles, Alaska: Raw Data File RDF 2019-9, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 2 p
    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Contribution: Bedrock geologic mapping
    Newberry, R.J., 2020 (source 7 of 10)
    Newberry, R.J., 2020, The Mount Fairplay igneous complex: Preliminary Interpretive Report PIR 2020-1, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 32 p
    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Contribution: Bedrock geologic mapping
    Twelker, Evan and O'Sullivan, P.B., 2021 (source 8 of 10)
    Twelker, Evan, and O'Sullivan, P.B., 2021, U-Pb detrital zircon geochronology of Cretaceous-Cenozoic sedimentary rocks in the Ladue River-Mount Fairplay area, Alaska: Preliminary Interpretive Report PIR 2021-2, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 16 p
    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Contribution: Bedrock geologic mapping
    Wildland, A.D. and others, 2021 (source 9 of 10)
    Wildland, A.D., Wypych, Alicja, Regan, S.P., and Holland, Mark, 2021, U-Pb zircon ages from bedrock samples collected in the Tanacross and Nabesna quadrangles, eastern Alaska: Preliminary Interpretive Report PIR 2021-4, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 47 p
    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Contribution: Bedrock geologic mapping
    Wypych, Alicja and others, 2019 (source 10 of 10)
    Wypych, Alicja, Twelker, Evan, Naibert, T.J., Athey, J.E., Newberry, R.J., Lopez, J.A., Regan, S.P., Sicard, K.R., Wildland, A.D., and Wyatt, W.C., 2019, Major-oxide and trace-element geochemical data from rocks collected in 2019 for the Eastern Tanacross project, Tanacross and part of Nabesna quadrangles, Alaska: Raw Data File RDF 2019-8, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 3 p
    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Contribution: Bedrock geologic mapping
  2. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?
    Date: 2019 (process 1 of 3)
    Bedrock geologic mapping - DGGS staff conducted 315 person-days of helicopter-supported fieldwork during 2019, plus limited compilation of existing geologic maps of the area to identify and delineate rock units, identify surface expression of structural elements, and collect geologic rock samples. Our map interpretation relies on observations of outcrop, subcrop, and float, and we make extensive use of airborne magnetic and magnetic-electromagnetic surveys for interpolation between field stations. Our mapping of high-angle faults relies on tilt-derivative processing of aeromagnetic data, low resistivity anomalies in electromagnetic surveys, photo and topographic lineaments, and lithologic discontinuities between ridges. Rock names were assigned based on field and petrographic observations, modal-mineral percentages, and interpretations of geochemical data. Age determinations and interpretation of cross-cutting relationships were facilitated by 40Ar/39Ar, and Zircon U-Pb geochronologic analysis. Data sources used in this process:
    • Burns, L.E. and others, 2020
    • Emond, A.M. and others, 2015
    • Emond, A.M. and others, 2015
    • Naibert, T.J. and others, 2020
    • Newberry, R.J., 2020
    • Twelker, Evan and O'Sullivan, P.B., 2021
    • Wildland, A.D. and others, 2021
    • Wypych, Alicja and others, 2019
    Date: 2020 (process 2 of 3)
    Geologic map compilation - Location data for field stations and field observations were collected using GPS-enabled tablets or smartphones running the ESRI Collector App. Data were merged into an ArcGIS geodatabase and geologic elements were drawn over applicable base maps and imagery and attributed using ESRI mapping software.
    Date: 2021 (process 3 of 3)
    GIS analysis and digital cartography - The geologic and geographic features portrayed in this data distribution package were organized and attributed according to the AK GeMS geologic mapping schema. Data sources used in this process:
    • Ekberg, P.G. and others, 2021
    • Hendricks, M.D. and others, 2021
  3. What similar or related data should the user be aware of?
    Twelker, Evan, 2021, Geologic investigation of the Ladue River-Mount Fairplay area, eastern Alaska: Report of Investigation RI 2021-5, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States.

    Online Links:


How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?

  1. How well have the observations been checked?
    Certainty in attribute interpretation varies throughout the map and is scale dependant. Attribute fields within each feature class record the authors' degree of confidence in the existence or identity of applicable features.
  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?
    Certainty in feature boundaries or location varies throughout the map. Data fields within each feature class and the accompanying orientation and location confidence lookup tables record the authors' degree of confidence in the location of applicable features.
  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?
  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?
    This publication is released as a DGGS Report of Investigations (RI). An RI is the completed product of original research and analysis, and RIs use professional cartography and undergo rigorous peer review, editing, and revision to ensure accuracy.
  5. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?
    All polygon features were topologically validated according to specifications of the AK GeMS geologic mapping schema.

How can someone get a copy of the data set?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?
Access_Constraints:
This report, map, and/or dataset is available directly from the State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys (see contact information below).
Use_Constraints:
Any hard copies or published datasets utilizing these datasets shall clearly indicate their source. If the user has modified the data in any way, the user is obligated to describe the types of modifications the user has made. The user specifically agrees not to misrepresent these datasets, nor to imply that changes made by the user were approved by the State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys. The State of Alaska makes no express or implied warranties (including warranties for merchantability and fitness) with respect to the character, functions, or capabilities of the electronic data or products or their appropriateness for any user's purposes. In no event will the State of Alaska be liable for any incidental, indirect, special, consequential, or other damages suffered by the user or any other person or entity whether from the use of the electronic services or products or any failure thereof or otherwise. In no event will the State of Alaska's liability to the Requestor or anyone else exceed the fee paid for the electronic service or product.
  1. Who distributes the data set? (Distributor 1 of 1)
    Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys
    Metadata Manager
    3354 College Road
    Fairbanks, AK
    USA

    (907)451-5020 (voice)
    (907)451-5050 (FAX)
    dggspubs@alaska.gov
    Hours_of_Service: 8 am to 4:30 pm, Monday through Friday, except State holidays
    Contact_Instructions:
    Please view our website (https://www.dggs.alaska.gov) for the latest information on available data. Please contact us using the e-mail address provided above when possible.
  2. What's the catalog number I need to order this data set? RI 2021-5A
  3. What legal disclaimers am I supposed to read?
    The State of Alaska makes no expressed or implied warranties (including warranties for merchantability and fitness) with respect to the character, functions, or capabilities of the electronic data or products or their appropriateness for any user's purposes. In no event will the State of Alaska be liable for any incidental, indirect, special, consequential, or other damages suffered by the user or any other person or entity whether from the use of the electronic services or products or any failure thereof or otherwise. In no event will the State of Alaska's liability to the Requestor or anyone else exceed the fee paid for the electronic service or product.
  4. How can I download or order the data?

Who wrote the metadata?

Dates:
Last modified: 21-Jul-2021
Metadata author:
Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys
Attn: Simone Montayne
Metadata Manager
3354 College Road
Fairbanks, AK
USA

(907)451-5020 (voice)
(907)451-5050 (FAX)
dggspubs@alaska.gov
Hours_of_Service: 8 am to 4:30 pm, Monday through Friday, except State holidays
Metadata standard:
FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (FGDC-STD-001-1998)
Metadata extensions used:

Generated by mp version 2.9.50 on Wed Jul 21 11:06:18 2021