State of Alaska Alaska / Natural Resources DNR / Geological & Geophysical Surveys DGGS / PublicationsPubs / Panda, S.K., 2011Panda, S.K., 2011

Panda, S.K., 2011

Permafrost distribution mapping and temperature modeling along the Alaska Highway Corridor, interior Alaska

Bibliographic Reference

Panda, S.K., 2011, Permafrost distribution mapping and temperature modeling along the Alaska Highway Corridor, interior Alaska: University of Alaska Fairbanks, Ph.D. dissertation, xi, 140 p.


An up-to-date permafrost distribution map is critical for making engineering decisions during the planning and design of any engineering project in Interior Alaska. I used a combination of empirical-statistical and remote sensing techniques to generate a high-resolution, spatially continuous, near-surface (< 1.6 m) permafrost map by exploiting the correlative relationships between permafrost and biophysical terrain parameters. A Binary Logistic Regression (BLR) model was used to establish the relationship between vegetation type, aspect-slope and permafrost presence. The logistic coefficients for each variable class obtained from the BLR model were supplied to respective variable classes mapped from remotely sensed data to estimate permafrost probability for every pixel. The BLR model predicts permafrost presence/absence at an accuracy of 88%. Near-surface permafrost occupies 37% of the total study area. A permafrost map based on the interpretation of airborne electromagnetic (EM) resistivity data shows 22.5-43.5% of the total study area as underlain by permafrost. Permafrost distribution statistics from both maps suggest near-surface permafrost distribution in the study area is sporadic (10-50% of the area underlain by permafrost). Changes in air temperature and/or winter snow depth are important factors responsible for permafrost aggradation or degradation. I evaluated the effects of past and recent (1941-2008) climate changes on permafrost and active-layer dynamics at selected locations using the Geophysical Institute Permafrost Laboratory model. Results revealed that active-layer thickness reached 0.58 and 1.0 m, and mean annual permafrost temperature increased by 1.6 and 1.7 degrees C between 1966 and 1994 at two sites in response to increased mean annual air temperature, mean summer air temperature, and winter snow depth. The study found that active-layer thickness is not only a function of summer air temperature but also of mean annual air temperature and winter snow depth. Model simulation with a projected (2008-2098) climate scenario predicts 0.22 m loss of near-surface permafrost at one site and complete permafrost disappearance at another site by 2098. The contrasting permafrost behaviors at different sites under similar climate scenarios highlight the role of soil type and ground ice volume on permafrost dynamics; these factors determine permafrost resilience under a warming climate.

Publication Products


Theses and Dissertations

Top of Page

Copyright © 2022 · State of Alaska · Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys · Webmaster