The listed tsunami source earthquake and landslide models are developed for hazard assessments of at-risk coastal communities throughout Alaska and indexed by the community names and the publications in which they are utilized.
The comprehensive publication of all models can be found here.
| Publication | Community Name(s) | Scenario Number/Model Name | Case ID |
|---|---|---|---|
| RI 2010-1 | Seward, Resurrection Bay | Scenario 1: Repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, SDM(Suito and Freymueller, 2009, in review) | 195 |
| RI 2010-1 | Seward, Resurrection Bay | Scenario 2: Modified 1964 event: Prince William Sound asperity of the SDM(Suito and Freymueller, 2009) | 197 |
| RI 2010-1 | Seward, Resurrection Bay | Scenario 3: Rupture of the Kodiak Island asperity of the repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, SDM(Suito and Freymueller, 2009, in review) | 196 |
| RI 2010-1 | Seward, Resurrection Bay | Scenario 4: Rupture of the Pamplona zone between the Yakutat block and North American Plate(hypothetical event) | 131 |
| RI 2010-1 | Seward, Resurrection Bay | Scenario 5: Three major underwater slide complexes of the 1964 earthquake - Seward downtown slide, Lowell Point slide, and Fourth of July slide | |
| RI 2010-1 | Seward, Resurrection Bay | Scenario 6: Simultaneous underwater slope failures at four locations where sediment accumulated since 1964 | |
| RI 2010-1 | Seward, Resurrection Bay | Scenario 7: Simultaneous underwater slope failures at four locations where sediment accumulated since 1964, with added sediment volumes | |
| RI 2011-7 | Whittier, Passage Canal | Scenario 1: Repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, JDM(Johnson et al., 1996) | 408 |
| RI 2011-7 | Whittier, Passage Canal | Scenario 2: Repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, SDM(Suito and Freymueller, 2009) | 409 |
| RI 2011-7 | Whittier, Passage Canal | Scenario 3: Multi-segment event based on the repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, JDM(Johnson et al., 1996) | 411 |
| RI 2011-7 | Whittier, Passage Canal | Scenario 4: Multi-segment event based on the repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, SDM(Suito and Freymueller, 2009, in review) | 465 |
| RI 2011-7 | Whittier, Passage Canal | Scenario 5: Earthquake in the Cascadia subduction zone along the British Columbia, Washington, Oregon and northern California shore(Geological Survey of Canada, K. Wang, written commun., 2010) | 458 |
| RI 2011-7 | Whittier, Passage Canal | Scenario 6: Rupture of the Prince William Sound asperity of the repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, JDM(Johnson et al., 1996) | 416 |
| RI 2011-7 | Whittier, Passage Canal | Scenario 7: Rupture of the Kodiak Island asperity of the repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, JDM(Johnson et al., 1996) | 414 |
| RI 2011-7 | Whittier, Passage Canal | Scenario 8: Rupture of the Prince William Sound asperity of the SDM(Suito and Freymueller, 2009) | 413 |
| RI 2011-7 | Whittier, Passage Canal | Scenario 9: Rupture of the Kodiak Island asperity of the SDM(Suito and Freymueller, 2009) | 412 |
| RI 2011-7 | Whittier, Passage Canal | Scenario 10: Repeat of the 1964 event: Major underwater slide complexes of the 1964 earthquake--Harbor, Airport, and Glacier (HAG) landslides | |
| RI 2011-7 | Whittier, Passage Canal | Scenario 11: Major underwater slide complex offshore of the northern shore of Passage Canal(hypothetical event) | |
| RI 2011-7 | Whittier, Passage Canal | Scenario 12: Major underwater slide complex offshore of the Billings Creek delta(hypothetical event) | |
| RI 2011-7 | Whittier, Passage Canal | Scenario 13: Simultaneous failure of underwater slide complexes described by scenarios 10-12(hypothetical event) | |
| RI 2013-1 | Valdez | Scenario 1: Repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, JDM(Johnson et al., 1996) | 836 |
| RI 2013-1 | Valdez | Scenario 2: Repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, SDM(Suito and Freymueller, 2009) | 826 |
| RI 2013-1 | Valdez | Scenario 3: Multi-segment event based on the repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, JDM(Johnson et al., 1996) | 840 |
| RI 2013-1 | Valdez | Scenario 4: Multi-segment event based on the repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, SDM(Suito and Freymueller, 2009, in review) | 829 |
| RI 2013-1 | Valdez | Scenario 5: Rupture of the Yakutat-Yakataga segment of the Aleutian megathrust(hypothetical event) | 839 |
| RI 2013-1 | Valdez | Scenario 6: Earthquake in the Cascadia subduction zone along the British Columbia, Washington, Oregon and northern California shore(Geological Survey of Canada, K. Wang, written commun., 2010) | 833 |
| RI 2013-1 | Valdez | Scenario 7: Rupture of the Prince William Sound asperity of the repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, JDM(Johnson et al., 1996) | 834 |
| RI 2013-1 | Valdez | Scenario 8: Rupture of the Kodiak Island asperity of the repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, JDM(Johnson et al., 1996) | 841 |
| RI 2013-1 | Valdez | Scenario 9: Rupture of the Prince William Sound asperity of the SDM(Suito and Freymueller, 2009) | 831 |
| RI 2013-1 | Valdez | Scenario 10: Rupture of the Kodiak Island asperity of the SDM(Suito and Freymueller, 2009) | 828 |
| RI 2013-1 | Valdez | Scenario 11: Modified multi-segment event: Rupture of the Prince William Sound and Yakutat-Yakataga segments of the repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, JDM(Johnson et al., 1996) | 838 |
| RI 2013-1 | Valdez | Scenario 12: Modified multi-segment event: Rupture of the Prince William Sound and Yakutat-Yakataga segments of the repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, SDM(Suito and Freymueller, 2009, in review) | 837 |
| RI 2013-1 | Valdez | Scenario 13: Mw8.8 earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region: 17-30 km, uniform slip along strike(hypothetical event) | 995 |
| RI 2013-1 | Valdez | Scenario 14: Mw8.8 earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region: 13-28 km, variable slip along strike(hypothetical event) | 996 |
| RI 2013-1 | Valdez | Scenario 15: Mw8.8 earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region: 12-29 km, variable slip along strike(hypothetical event) | 997 |
| RI 2013-1 | Valdez | Scenario 16: Repeat of the 1964-type event: An underwater slide at the head of Port Valdez - HPV slide | |
| RI 2013-1 | Valdez | Scenario 17: Repeat of the 1964-type event: An underwater slide at Shoup Bay moraine - SBM slide | |
| RI 2013-1 | Valdez | Scenario 18: Underwater slide offshore of Mineral Creek - MC slide(hypothetical event) | |
| RI 2013-1 | Valdez | Scenario 19: Underwater slide offshore of Gold Creek - GC slide(hypothetical event) | |
| RI 2013-1 | Valdez | Scenario 20: Underwater slide offshore of Lowe River - LR slide(hypothetical event) | |
| RI 2013-1 | Valdez | Scenario 21: Underwater slide at Shoup Bay moraine - SBM residual slide(hypothetical event) | |
| RI 2013-1 | Valdez | Scenario 22: Simultaneous failure of Mineral Creek, Gold Creek, Lowe River, Shoup Bay moraine underwater slides (hypothetical event) | |
| RI 2013-3 | Sitka | Scenario 1: Multi-segment event based on the repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, JDM(Johnson et al., 1996) | 991 |
| RI 2013-3 | Sitka | Scenario 2: Multi-segment event based on the repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, SDM(Suito and Freymueller, 2009, in review) | 905 |
| RI 2013-3 | Sitka | Scenario 3: Multi-segment JDM event: The PWS and KP segments of the 1964 rupture, and the YY segment(hypothetical event) | 847 |
| RI 2013-3 | Sitka | Scenario 4: Multi-segment SDM event: The PWS and KP segments of the 1964 rupture, and the YY segment(hypothetical event) | 906 |
| RI 2013-3 | Sitka | Scenario 5: Multi-segment event: the Tohoku-type rupture of the PWS, KP and KI segments(hypothetical event) | 988 |
| RI 2013-3 | Sitka | Scenario 6: The SAFRR tsunami scenario (SEM and SH segments)(Ross and others, 2013) | 852 |
| RI 2013-3 | Sitka | Scenario 7: Rupture in the Eastern Aleutians, from Semidi Islands to Fox Islands (SEM, SH, UN and FOX segments)(hypothetical event) | 984 |
| RI 2013-3 | Sitka | Scenario 8: Earthquake in the Cascadia subduction zone along the British Columbia, Washington, Oregon and northern California shore(Geological Survey of Canada, K. Wang, written commun., 2010) | 846 |
| RI 2013-3 | Sitka | Scenario 9: Mw8.2 thrust earthquake in the Haida Gwaii area(hypothetical event) | 985 |
| RI 2014-1 | Cordova, Tatitlek | Scenario 1: Repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, JDM(Johnson et al., 1996) | 1034 |
| RI 2014-1 | Cordova, Tatitlek | Scenario 2: Repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, SDM(Suito and Freymueller, 2009, in review) | 1035 |
| RI 2014-1 | Cordova, Tatitlek | Scenario 3: Multi-segment event based on the repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, JDM(Johnson et al., 1996) | 1038 |
| RI 2014-1 | Cordova, Tatitlek | Scenario 4: Multi-segment event based on the repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, SDM(Suito and Freymueller, 2009, in review) | 1039 |
| RI 2014-1 | Cordova, Tatitlek | Scenario 5: Rupture of the Yakutat-Yakataga segment of the Aleutian megathrust(hypothetical event) | 1040 |
| RI 2014-1 | Cordova, Tatitlek | Scenario 6: Earthquake in the Cascadia subduction zone along the British Columbia, Washington, Oregon and northern California shore(Geological Survey of Canada, K. Wang, written commun., 2010) | 1041 |
| RI 2014-1 | Cordova, Tatitlek | Scenario 7: Mw8.8 earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region, based on case A of the slip distribution: 4-18 km depth, uniform slip along strike(hypothetical event) | 1045 |
| RI 2014-1 | Cordova, Tatitlek | Scenario 8: Mw8.8 earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region, based on case C of the slip distribution: 12-30 km depth, uniform slip along strike(hypothetical event) | 1047 |
| RI 2014-1 | Cordova, Tatitlek | Scenario 9: Mw8.8 earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region, based on case D of the slip distribution: 4-18 km depth, variable slip along strike(hypothetical event) | 1044 |
| RI 2014-1 | Cordova, Tatitlek | Scenario 10: Mw8.8 earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region, based on case F of the slip distribution: 12-30 km depth, variable slip along strike(hypothetical event) | 1046 |
| RI 2014-1 | Cordova, Tatitlek | Scenario 11: Mw9.0 earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region: 4-18 km depth, uniform slip along strike, Tohoku-type event | 1050 |
| RI 2014-1 | Cordova, Tatitlek | Scenario 12: Mw9.0 earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region: 4-18 km depth, variable slip along strike, Tohoku-type event | 1051 |
| RI 2014-1 | Cordova, Tatitlek | Scenario 13: Mw8.8 earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region: 12-28 km to 17-30 km depth, uniform slip along strike | 1048 |
| RI 2014-1 | Cordova, Tatitlek | Scenario 14: Malaspina-Pamplona system(Elliott, 2011) | 1042 |
| RI 2014-1 | Cordova, Tatitlek | Scenario 15: Yakataga-Chaix Hills system(Elliott, 2011) | 1043 |
| RI 2014-3 | Chenega Bay, Sawmill Bay | Scenario 1: Earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region, repeat of the 1964 event, PDM (Plafker, 1969) | Sawmill/PDM |
| RI 2014-3 | Chenega Bay, Sawmill Bay | Scenario 2: Repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, JDM(Johnson et al., 1996) | Sawmill/JDM |
| RI 2014-3 | Chenega Bay, Sawmill Bay | Scenario 3: Repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, SDM(Suito and Freymueller, 2009, in review) | Sawmill/SDM |
| RI 2014-3 | Chenega Bay, Sawmill Bay | Scenario 4: Multi-segment event based on the repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, JDM(Johnson et al., 1996) | Sawmill/JDMY |
| RI 2014-3 | Chenega Bay, Sawmill Bay | Scenario 5: Repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, SDM(Suito and Freymueller, 2009) | Sawmill/SDMY |
| RI 2014-3 | Chenega Bay, Sawmill Bay | Scenario 6: Rupture of the Yakutat-Yakataga segment of the Aleutian megathrust(hypothetical event) | Sawmill/YY |
| RI 2014-3 | Chenega Bay, Sawmill Bay | Scenario 7: Rupture of the Kodiak Island asperity of the repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, JDM(Johnson et al., 1996) | Sawmill/JDMK |
| RI 2014-3 | Chenega Bay, Sawmill Bay | Scenario 8: Rupture of the Kodiak Island asperity of the repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, SDM(Suito and Freymueller, 2009, in review) | Sawmill/SDMK |
| RI 2014-3 | Chenega Bay, Sawmill Bay | Scenario 9: Earthquake in the Cascadia subduction zone along the British Columbia, Washington, Oregon and northern California shore(Geological Survey of Canada, K. Wang, written commun., 2010) | Sawmill/CAS1200 |
| RI 2014-3 | Chenega Bay, Sawmill Bay | Scenario 10: Mw9.0 earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region: 4-18 km depth, variable slip along strike, Tohoku-type event | Sawmill/Toh |
| RI 2015-1 | Elfin Cove, Gustavus, Hoonah | Scenario 1: Multi-segment event based on the repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, JDM(Johnson et al., 1996) | 1243 |
| RI 2015-1 | Elfin Cove, Gustavus, Hoonah | Scenario 2: Multi-segment event: the Tohoku-type rupture of the PWS, KP and KI segments(hypothetical event) | 1276 |
| RI 2015-1 | Elfin Cove, Gustavus, Hoonah | Scenario 3: Mw9.0 earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region: 4-18 km depth, variable slip along strike, Tohoku-type event | 1197 |
| RI 2015-1 | Elfin Cove, Gustavus, Hoonah | Scenario 4: Mw9.0 earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region: 4-18 km depth, uniform slip along strike, Tohoku-type event | 1198 |
| RI 2015-1 | Elfin Cove, Gustavus, Hoonah | Scenario 5: The SAFRR tsunami scenario (SEM and SH segments)(Ross and others, 2013) | 1244 |
| RI 2015-1 | Elfin Cove, Gustavus, Hoonah | Scenario 6: Rupture in the Eastern Aleutians, from Semidi Islands to Fox Islands (SEM, SH, UN and FOX segments)(hypothetical event) | 1245 |
| RI 2015-1 | Elfin Cove, Gustavus, Hoonah | Scenario 7: Earthquake in the Cascadia subduction zone along the British Columbia, Washington, Oregon and northern California shore(Geological Survey of Canada, K. Wang, written commun., 2010) | 1196 |
| RI 2015-1 | Elfin Cove, Gustavus, Hoonah | Scenario 8: Underwater slide in Taylor Bay | |
| RI 2015-1 | Elfin Cove, Gustavus, Hoonah | Scenario 9: Subaerial rockslide in Tidal Inlet | |
| RI 2015-1 | Elfin Cove, Gustavus, Hoonah | Scenario 10: Underwater slide in Port Frederick | |
| RI 2015-5 | Fox Islands, Dutch Harbor, Akutan, Unalaska | Scenario 1: Mw9.1 earthquake, Fox Islands region | 1263; 1253 |
| RI 2015-5 | Fox Islands, Dutch Harbor, Akutan, Unalaska | Scenario 2: Mw9.0 earthquake, Fox Islands region | 1264; 1254 |
| RI 2015-5 | Fox Islands, Dutch Harbor, Akutan, Unalaska | Scenario 3: Mw8.8 earthquake, Fox Islands region | 1265; 1255 |
| RI 2015-5 | Fox Islands, Dutch Harbor, Akutan, Unalaska | Scenario 4: The SAFRR tsunami scenario (SEM and SH segments)(Ross and others, 2013) | 1268; 1258 |
| RI 2015-5 | Fox Islands, Dutch Harbor, Akutan, Unalaska | Scenario 5: Mw9.0 SAFRR-type earthquake, Fox Islands region | 1259 |
| RI 2015-5 | Fox Islands, Dutch Harbor, Akutan, Unalaska | Scenario 6: Mw9.0 SAFRR-type earthquake, Krenitzin Island region | 1266; 1256 |
| RI 2015-5 | Fox Islands, Dutch Harbor, Akutan, Unalaska | Scenario 7: Mw9.2 East Aleutian earthquake | 1581 |
| RI 2015-5 | Fox Islands, Dutch Harbor, Akutan, Unalaska | Scenario 8: Mw9.25 East Aleutian earthquake | 1589 |
| RI 2015-5 | Fox Islands, Dutch Harbor, Akutan, Unalaska | Scenario 9: Earthquake in the Cascadia subduction zone along the British Columbia, Washington, Oregon and northern California shore(Geological Survey of Canada, K. Wang, written commun., 2010) | 1258 |
| RI 2015-5 | Fox Islands, Dutch Harbor, Akutan, Unalaska | Scenario 10: Mw8.6 outer-rise earthquake, Fox Islands region | 1260 |
| RI 2016-1 | King Cove, Cold Bay | Scenario 1: Earthquake in western Alaska Peninsula region: Two asperities and trench | 1622 |
| RI 2016-1 | King Cove, Cold Bay | Scenario 2: Earthquake in western Alaska Peninsula region: Two asperities, weakly connected | 1652 |
| RI 2016-1 | King Cove, Cold Bay | Scenario 3: Earthquake in western Alaska Peninsula region: Eastern asperity and trench | 1640 |
| RI 2016-1 | King Cove, Cold Bay | Scenario 4: Earthquake in western Alaska Peninsula region: Western asperity and trench | 1623 |
| RI 2016-1 | King Cove, Cold Bay | Scenario 5: Earthquake in western Alaska Peninsula region: Eastern asperity only | 1653 |
| RI 2016-1 | King Cove, Cold Bay | Scenario 6: Earthquake in western Alaska Peninsula region: Western asperity only | 1654 |
| RI 2016-1 | King Cove, Cold Bay | Scenario 7: Mw8.9 earthquake in western Alaska Peninsula region: Gap-filling event | 1627 |
| RI 2016-1 | King Cove, Cold Bay | Scenario 8: Mw9.0 earthquake in western Alaska Peninsula region: Predominantly shallow slip in the western part of the rupture | 1620 |
| RI 2016-1 | King Cove, Cold Bay | Scenario 9: Mw9.1 earthquake in western Alaska Peninsula region: Predominantly shallow slip in the eastern part of the rupture | 1628 |
| RI 2016-1 | King Cove, Cold Bay | Scenario 10: Mw9.2 earthquake in the western Alaska Peninsula region | 1592 |
| RI 2016-1 | King Cove, Cold Bay | Scenario 11: Mw9.3 earthquake in the western Alaska Peninsula region | 1613 |
| RI 2016-1 | King Cove, Cold Bay | Scenario 12: The SAFRR tsunami scenario (SEM and SH segments)(Ross and others, 2013) | 1569 |
| RI 2016-1 | King Cove, Cold Bay | Scenario 13: Mw9.0 earthquake in the western Alaska Peninsula region: SAFRR-type event | 1591 |
| RI 2016-1 | King Cove, Cold Bay | Scenario 14: Rupture in the Eastern Aleutians, from Semidi Islands to Fox Islands (SEM, SH, UN and FOX segments)(hypothetical event) | 1590 |
| RI 2016-1 | King Cove, Cold Bay | Scenario 15: Mw8.6 outer-rise earthquake in western Alaska Peninsula region | 1626 |
| RI 2016-1 | King Cove, Cold Bay | Scenario 16: Earthquake in the Cascadia subduction zone along the British Columbia, Washington, Oregon and northern California shore(Geological Survey of Canada, K. Wang, written commun., 2010) | 1572 |
| RI 2016-2 | Yakutat | Scenario 1: Multi-segment event based on the repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, JDM(Johnson et al., 1996) | 1369 |
| RI 2016-2 | Yakutat | Scenario 2: Multi-segment event based on the repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, SDM(Suito and Freymueller, 2009, in review) | 1370 |
| RI 2016-2 | Yakutat | Scenario 3: Multi-segment event: the Tohoku-type rupture of the PWS, KP and KI segments(hypothetical event) | 1363 |
| RI 2016-2 | Yakutat | Scenario 4: Multi-segment event: the Tohoku-type rupture of the PWS, KP, KI, and YY segments(hypothetical event) | 1371 |
| RI 2016-2 | Yakutat | Scenario 5: Mw9.0 earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region: 4-18 km depth, uniform slip along strike, Tohoku-type event | 1368 |
| RI 2016-2 | Yakutat | Scenario 6: Mw9.0 earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region: 4-18 km depth, variable slip along strike, Tohoku-type event | 1367 |
| RI 2016-2 | Yakutat | Scenario 7: The SAFRR tsunami scenario (SEM and SH segments)(Ross and others, 2013) | 1364 |
| RI 2016-2 | Yakutat | Scenario 8: The Otmeloi fault rupture(hypothetical event) | 1313 |
| RI 2016-2 | Yakutat | Scenario 9: The Yakutat fault rupture(hypothetical event) | 1321 |
| RI 2016-2 | Yakutat | Scenario 10: A model of the 1899 Yakutat Bay earthquake(Plafker, 2008) | 1316 |
| RI 2016-2 | Yakutat | Scenario 11: Hypothetical landslide scenario: Yakutat western slide | |
| RI 2016-2 | Yakutat | Scenario 12: Hypothetical landslide scenario: Yakutat eastern slide | |
| RI 2016-2 | Yakutat | Scenario 13: Hypothetical landslide scenario: Yakutat central slide | |
| RI 2016-2 | Yakutat | Scenario 14: Hypothetical landslide scenario: Yakutat town slide | |
| RI 2016-7 | Nikolski | Scenario 1: Mw9.1 earthquake in the Fox Islands region, based on hypothetical cases C and D | 1638 |
| RI 2016-7 | Nikolski | Scenario 2: Mw9.1 earthquake in the Fox Islands region, based on hypothetical cases D and E | 1637 |
| RI 2016-7 | Nikolski | Scenario 3: Mw9.1 earthquake in the Fox Islands region, based on hypothetical case C | 1646 |
| RI 2016-7 | Nikolski | Scenario 4: The SAFRR tsunami scenario (SEM and SH segments)(Ross and others, 2013) | 1651 |
| RI 2016-7 | Nikolski | Scenario 5: Mw9.0 SAFRR-type earthquake in the Samalga Pass region | 1650 |
| RI 2016-7 | Nikolski | Scenario 6: Mw9.2 East Aleutian earthquake | 1635 |
| RI 2016-7 | Nikolski | Scenario 7: Mw9.25 East Aleutian earthquake | 1639 |
| RI 2016-7 | Nikolski | Scenario 8: Mw9.1 earthquake, Fox Islands region | 1455 |
| RI 2016-7 | Nikolski | Scenario 9: Earthquake in the Cascadia subduction zone along the British Columbia, Washington, Oregon and northern California shore(Geological Survey of Canada, K. Wang, written commun., 2010) | 1457 |
| RI 2016-7 | Nikolski | Scenario 10: Mw8.6 outer-rise earthquake in the Umnak Island region | 1456 |
| RI 2016-8 | Chignik, Chignik Lagoon | Scenario 1: Mw8.9 earthquake along Alaska Peninsula, 30 km depth | 1672 |
| RI 2016-8 | Chignik, Chignik Lagoon | Scenario 2: Mw8.9 earthquake along Alaska Peninsula, 25 km depth | 1673 |
| RI 2016-8 | Chignik, Chignik Lagoon | Scenario 3: Mw8.9 earthquake along Alaska Peninsula, 35 km depth | 1674 |
| RI 2016-8 | Chignik, Chignik Lagoon | Scenario 4: Mw9.0 earthquake along Alaska Peninsula, 10 km depth | 1677 |
| RI 2016-8 | Chignik, Chignik Lagoon | Scenario 5: Mw9.0 earthquake along Alaska Peninsula, 13 km depth | 1670 |
| RI 2016-8 | Chignik, Chignik Lagoon | Scenario 6: Mw9.0 earthquake along Alaska Peninsula, 17 km depth | 1671 |
| RI 2016-8 | Chignik, Chignik Lagoon | Scenario 7: The SAFRR tsunami scenario (SEM and SH segments)(Ross and others, 2013) | 1452 |
| RI 2016-8 | Chignik, Chignik Lagoon | Scenario 8: Mw9.2 Alaska Peninsula earthquake | 1678 |
| RI 2016-8 | Chignik, Chignik Lagoon | Scenario 9: Mw9.25 Alaska Peninsula earthquake | 1679 |
| RI 2016-8 | Chignik, Chignik Lagoon | Scenario 10: Earthquake in the Cascadia subduction zone along the British Columbia, Washington, Oregon and northern California shore(Geological Survey of Canada, K. Wang, written commun., 2010) | 1453 |
| RI 2016-8 | Chignik, Chignik Lagoon | Scenario 11: Mw8.6 outer-rise earthquake along the Alaska Peninsula | 1454; 1680 |
| RI 2017-2 | Adak, Atka | Scenario 1: Mw9.0 earthquake in the Adak and Akta region: SAFRR-type event, slip near trench | 1687 |
| RI 2017-2 | Adak, Atka | Scenario 2: Mw9.0 earthquake in the Adak and Akta region: Max slip 15-25 km depth | 1697 |
| RI 2017-2 | Adak, Atka | Scenario 3: Mw9.0 earthquake in the Adak and Akta region: Max slip 25-35 km depth | 1718 |
| RI 2017-3 | Sand Point | Scenario 1: Mw8.8 earthquake, Shumagin Islands region based on cases C, D, and the Simeonof segment | 1388 |
| RI 2017-3 | Sand Point | Scenario 2: Mw8.85 earthquake, Shumagin Islands region based on cases B, C, D, and the Simeonof segment | 1389 |
| RI 2017-3 | Sand Point | Scenario 3: Mw8.85 earthquake, Shumagin Islands region based on cases C, D, E, and the Simeonof segment | 1391 |
| RI 2017-3 | Sand Point | Scenario 4: Mw8.9 earthquake, Shumagin Islands region based on cases B, C, D, E, and the Simeonof segment | 1390 |
| RI 2017-3 | Sand Point | Scenario 5: Mw8.9 earthquake, Shumagin Islands area based on cases C, D, E, Simeonof and near-trench segment | 1387 |
| RI 2017-3 | Sand Point | Scenario 6: Mw8.95 earthquake, Shumagin Islands area based on cases B C D E, Simeonof and near-trench segment | 1386 |
| RI 2017-3 | Sand Point | Scenario 7: The SAFRR tsunami scenario (SEM and SH segments)(Ross and others, 2013) | 1392 |
| RI 2017-3 | Sand Point | Scenario 8: Earthquake in the Cascadia subduction zone along the British Columbia, Washington, Oregon and northern California shore(Geological Survey of Canada, K. Wang, written commun., 2010) | 1393 |
| RI 2017-3 | Sand Point | Scenario 9: Mw8.6 outer rise earthquake in the Shumagin Islands region | 1394 |
| RI 2017-8 | Kodiak | Scenario 1: Repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, JDM(Johnson et al., 1996) | 1868 |
| RI 2017-8 | Kodiak | Scenario 2: Mw9.1 earthquake in the area of Kodiak Island, 10 km depth | 1862 |
| RI 2017-8 | Kodiak | Scenario 3: Mw9.0 earthquake in the area of Kodiak Island, 15 km depth | 1865 |
| RI 2017-8 | Kodiak | Scenario 4: Mw9.0 earthquake in the area of Kodiak Island, 20 km depth | 1864 |
| RI 2017-8 | Kodiak | Scenario 5: Mw9.0 earthquake in the area of Kodiak Island, 25 km depth | 1863 |
| RI 2017-8 | Kodiak | Scenario 6: Mw9.1 earthquake in the area of Kodiak Island, 15-25 km depth | 1869 |
| RI 2017-8 | Kodiak | Scenario 7: Mw9.1 earthquake in the area of Kodiak Island with a splay fault, 15-25 km depth | 1870 |
| RI 2017-8 | Kodiak | Scenario 8: Mw9.2 earthquake in the area of Kodiak Island with 44 m of maximum slip | 1871 |
| RI 2017-8 | Kodiak | Scenario 9: Mw9.25 earthquake in the area of Kodiak Island with 50 m of maximum slip | 1873 |
| RI 2017-8 | Kodiak | Scenario 10: Earthquake in the Cascadia subduction zone along the British Columbia, Washington, Oregon and northern California shore(Geological Survey of Canada, K. Wang, written commun., 2010) | 1886 |
| RI 2017-9 | Juneau | Scenario 1: Repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, with four sub-scenarios | 2000, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2011 |
| RI 2017-9 | Juneau | Scenario 2: Earthquake modeling extension of the 1964 rupture to the YY segment | 1787, 1799 |
| RI 2017-9 | Juneau | Scenario 3: Multi-segment event: the Tohoku-type rupture of the PWS, KP and KI segments(hypothetical event) | 1783, 1795 |
| RI 2017-9 | Juneau | Scenario 4: Multi-segment event: the Tohoku-type rupture of the PWS, KP, KI, and YY segments(hypothetical event) | 2015, 1798 |
| RI 2017-9 | Juneau | Scenario 5: Mw9.0 earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region: 4-18 km depth, variable slip along strike, Tohoku-type event | 1785, 1797 |
| RI 2017-9 | Juneau | Scenario 6: The SAFRR tsunami scenario (SEM and SH segments)(Ross and others, 2013) | 1784, 1796 |
| RI 2017-9 | Juneau | Scenario 7: Earthquake in the Cascadia subduction zone along the British Columbia, Washington, Oregon and northern California shore(Geological Survey of Canada, K. Wang, written commun., 2010) | 1788, 1800 |
| RI 2017-9 | Juneau | Scenario 8: An underwater slide at the head of Fritz Cove (FC slide) | |
| RI 2017-9 | Juneau | Scenario 9: An underwater slide offshore of Eagle River (ER slide) | |
| RI 2017-9 | Juneau | Scenario 10: An underwater slide at the head of Berners Bay (BB slide) | |
| RI 2017-9 | Juneau | Scenario 11: An underwater slide offshore of Sheep Creek (SC slide) | |
| RI 2017-9 | Juneau | Scenario 12: An underwater slide at South Franklin Street (SFS slide) | |
| RI 2017-9 | Juneau | Scenario 13: An underwater slide in Taku Inlet (TI slide) | |
| RI 2018-2 | Haines, Skagway | Scenario 1: Repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, with four sub-scenarios | 2013 |
| RI 2018-2 | Haines, Skagway | Scenario 2: Earthquake modeling extension of the 1964 rupture to the YY segment | 1907 |
| RI 2018-2 | Haines, Skagway | Scenario 3: Multi-segment event: the Tohoku-type rupture of the PWS, KP and KI segments(hypothetical event) | 1908 |
| RI 2018-2 | Haines, Skagway | Scenario 4: Multi-segment event: the Tohoku-type rupture of the PWS, KP, KI, and YY segments(hypothetical event) | 1910 |
| RI 2018-2 | Haines, Skagway | Scenario 5: Mw9.0 earthquake in the Gulf of Alaska region: 4-18 km depth, variable slip along strike, Tohoku-type event | 1911 |
| RI 2018-2 | Haines, Skagway | Scenario 6: The SAFRR tsunami scenario (SEM and SH segments)(Ross and others, 2013) | 1912 |
| RI 2018-2 | Haines, Skagway | Scenario 7: Earthquake in the Cascadia subduction zone along the British Columbia, Washington, Oregon and northern California shore(Geological Survey of Canada, K. Wang, written commun., 2010) | 1913 |
| RI 2018-2 | Haines, Skagway | Scenario 8: An underwater slide at the mouth of the Taiya River delta (Taiya River Slide) | |
| RI 2018-2 | Haines, Skagway | Scenario 9: An underwater slide offshore of the Skagway River delta (Skagway River Slide) | |
| RI 2018-2 | Haines, Skagway | Scenario 10: An underwater slide offshore of the Glacier Point (Glacier Point Slide) | |
| RI 2018-2 | Haines, Skagway | Scenario 11: An underwater slide at the mouth of the Chilkat River delta (Chilkat River Slide) | |
| RI 2018-2 | Haines, Skagway | Scenario 12: An underwater slide at the mouth of the Katzehin River delta (Katzehin River Slide) | |
| RI 2018-2 | Haines, Skagway | Scenario 13: An underwater slide at the Taiyasanka Harbor moraine (Taiyasanka Harbor Slide) | |
| RI 2018-5 v. 2 | Homer, Seldovia | Scenario 1: Repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, with four sub-scenarios | 2018, 2028, 2029, 2030 |
| RI 2018-5 v. 2 | Homer, Seldovia | Scenario 2: Earthquake in the KI-KP region: Predominantly shallow slip with maximum slip at a depth of 0-10 km | 2020, 2036, 2039 |
| RI 2018-5 v. 2 | Homer, Seldovia | Scenario 3: Earthquake in the KI-KP region: Predominantly shallow slip with maximum slip at a depth of 5-15 km | 2024, 2037, 2038 |
| RI 2018-5 v. 2 | Homer, Seldovia | Scenario 4: Earthquake in the KI-KP region: 50 m of maximum slip | 1997 |
| RI 2018-5 v. 2 | Homer, Seldovia | Scenario 5: Earthquake in the KI-KP region: 5-15 km depth and uniform along strike slip distribution | 2026, 2027, 2040 |
| RI 2018-5 v. 2 | Homer, Seldovia | Scenario 6: Earthquake in the KI-KP region: 15-35 km depth and uniform along strike slip distribution | 2031, 2032, 2033 |
| RI 2018-5 v. 2 | Homer, Seldovia | Scenario 7: Earthquake in the KI-KP region: 35 m of maximum slip for almost the entire rupture patch | 1996 |
| RI 2018-5 v. 2 | Homer, Seldovia | Scenario 8: The SAFRR tsunami scenario (SEM and SH segments)(Ross and others, 2013) | 2047 |
| RI 2018-5 v. 2 | Homer, Seldovia | Scenario 9: Earthquake in the Cascadia subduction zone along the British Columbia, Washington, Oregon and northern California shore(Geological Survey of Canada, K. Wang, written commun., 2010) | 2049 |
| RI 2018-5 v. 2 | Homer, Seldovia | Scenario 10: An underwater slide offshore of the Cook Inlet side of Homer Spit | |
| RI 2018-5 v. 2 | Homer, Seldovia | Scenario 11: An underwater slide offshore at the tip of Homer Spit | |
| RI 2018-5 v. 2 | Homer, Seldovia | Scenario 12: An underwater slide of the Kachemak Bay side of Homer Spit | |
| RI 2018-5 v. 2 | Homer, Seldovia | Scenario 13: An underwater slide at the mouth of the Wosnesenski River | |
| RI 2018-5 v. 2 | Homer, Seldovia | Scenario 14: An underwater slide at the mouth of the Grewingk Creek | |
| RI 2019-1 | Adak, Atka | Scenario 1: Earthquake in the Andreanof Islands region, maximum slip 15-25 km depth, uniform slip along strike | 2103; 2112 |
| RI 2019-1 | Adak, Atka | Scenario 2: Earthquake in the Andreanof Islands region, maximum slip 25-35 km depth, uniform slip along strike | 2104; 2110 |
| RI 2019-1 | Adak, Atka | Scenario 3: Earthquake in the Andreanof Islands region, maximum slip 35-45 km depth, uniform slip along strike | 2105; 2108 |
| RI 2019-1 | Adak, Atka | Scenario 4: Earthquake in the Andreanof Islands region, maximum slip 15-35 km depth, uniform slip along strike | 2106; 2111 |
| RI 2019-1 | Adak, Atka | Scenario 5: Earthquake in the Andreanof Islands region, maximum slip 25-45 km depth, uniform slip along strike | 2107; 2109 |
| RI 2019-1 | Adak, Atka | Scenario 6: Earthquake in the Andreanof Islands region, 35 m max slip across majority of rupture | 2101; 2113 |
| RI 2019-1 | Adak, Atka | Scenario 7: Earthquake in the Andreanof Islands region, 50 m max slip near trench, 20 m slip in rest of rupture | 2147; 2114 |
| RI 2019-1 | Adak, Atka | Scenario 8: The SAFRR tsunami scenario (SEM and SH segments)(Ross and others, 2013) | 2123 |
| RI 2019-1 | Adak, Atka | Scenario 9: Earthquake in the Cascadia subduction zone along the British Columbia, Washington, Oregon and northern California shore(Geological Survey of Canada, K. Wang, written commun., 2010) | 2124 |
| RI 2019-3 | False Pass | Scenario 1: Mw9.0 earthquake in the False Pass/Perryville area: SAFRR-type event, slip near trench | 1689 |
| RI 2019-3 | False Pass | Scenario 2: Mw9.0 earthquake in the False Pass/Perryville area: Max slip 15-25 km depth | 1701 |
| RI 2019-3 | False Pass | Scenario 3: Mw9.0 earthquake in the False Pass/Perryville area: Max slip 25-35 km depth | 1702 |
| RI 2019-4 | Shemya | Scenario 1: Mw9.0 earthquake near Shemya: SAFRR-type event, slip near the trench | 1688 |
| RI 2019-4 | Shemya | Scenario 2: Mw9.0 earthquake near Shemya: Max slip 15-25 km depth | 1699 |
| RI 2019-4 | Shemya | Scenario 3: Mw9.0 earthquake near Shemya: Max slip 25-35 km depth | 1700 |
| RI 2019-5 | Kenai: Anchor Point, Nanwalek, Port Graham | Scenario 1: Mw9.0 earthquake in the Kodiak region, east segment: SAFRR-type event, slip near trench | 1734 |
| RI 2019-5 | Kenai: Anchor Point, Nanwalek, Port Graham | Scenario 2: Mw9.0 earthquake in the Kodiak region, east segment: Max slip 15-25 km depth | 1735 |
| RI 2019-5 | Kenai: Anchor Point, Nanwalek, Port Graham | Scenario 3: Mw9.0 earthquake in the Kodiak region, east segment: Max slip 25-35 km depth | 1736 |
| RI 2019-6 | Akhiok, Chiniak, Karluk, Larsen Bay, Old Harbor, Ouzinkie, and Port Lions | Scenario 1: Mw9.0 earthquake in the Kodiak region: SAFRR-type event, applied to west, center & east segments | 1690, 1704, 1707 |
| RI 2019-6 | Akhiok, Chiniak, Karluk, Larsen Bay, Old Harbor, Ouzinkie, and Port Lions | Scenario 2: Mw9.0 earthquake in the Kodiak region: Max slip 15-25 km, applied to west, center & east segments | 1716, 1705, 1712 |
| RI 2019-6 | Akhiok, Chiniak, Karluk, Larsen Bay, Old Harbor, Ouzinkie, and Port Lions | Scenario 3: Mw9.0 earthquake in the Kodiak region: Max slip 25-35 km, applied to west, center & east segments | 1694, 1706, 1709 |
| RI 2019-6A | Pasagshak | Scenario 1: Mw9.0 earthquake in the Kodiak region: SAFRR-type event, applied to west, center & east segments | 2440, 2443, 2446 |
| RI 2019-6A | Pasagshak | Scenario 2: Mw9.0 earthquake in the Kodiak region: Max slip 15-25 km, applied to west, center & east segments | 2438, 2441, 2444 |
| RI 2019-6A | Pasagshak | Scenario 3: Mw9.0 earthquake in the Kodiak region: Max slip 25-35 km, applied to west, center & east segments | 2451, 2442, 2445 |
| RI 2019-7 | Craig, Ketchikan, Mountain Point, Port Alexander, Saxman | Scenario 1: Multi-segment event based on the repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, JDM(Johnson et al., 1996) | 1738, 1737 |
| RI 2019-7 | Craig, Ketchikan, Mountain Point, Port Alexander, Saxman | Scenario 2: Multi-segment event: the Tohoku-type rupture of the PWS, KP and KI segments(hypothetical event) | 1740, 1743 |
| RI 2019-7 | Craig, Ketchikan, Mountain Point, Port Alexander, Saxman | Scenario 3: The SAFRR tsunami scenario (SEM and SH segments)(Ross and others, 2013) | 1741, 1744 |
| RI 2019-7 | Craig, Ketchikan, Mountain Point, Port Alexander, Saxman | Scenario 4: Earthquake in the Cascadia subduction zone along the British Columbia, Washington, Oregon and northern California shore(Geological Survey of Canada, K. Wang, written commun., 2010) | 1742, 1745 |
| RI 2020-1 | Nelson Lagoon, Platinum, Dillingham, St. Paul, St. George | Scenario 1: Mw9.2 earthquake in Bristol Bay & Pribilof Islands: Slip at 5-45km; max slip 15-35km, ruptures A-D | 2053, 2054, 2055, 2056 |
| RI 2020-1 | Nelson Lagoon, Platinum, Dillingham, St. Paul, St. George | Scenario 2: Mw9.2 earthquake in Bristol Bay & Pribilof Islands: Slip at 10-50km; max slip 30-40km, ruptures E-H | 2064, 2058, 2059, 2060 |
| RI 2020-2 | Kasaan, Klawock, Metlakatla, Pelican, Point Baker, Port Protection | Scenario 1: Multi-segment event based on the repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, JDM(Johnson et al., 1996) | 2065 |
| RI 2020-2 | Kasaan, Klawock, Metlakatla, Pelican, Point Baker, Port Protection | Scenario 2: Multi-segment event: the Tohoku-type rupture of the PWS, KP and KI segments(hypothetical event) | 2066 |
| RI 2020-2 | Kasaan, Klawock, Metlakatla, Pelican, Point Baker, Port Protection | Scenario 3: The SAFRR tsunami scenario (SEM and SH segments)(Ross and others, 2013) | 2067 |
| RI 2020-2 | Kasaan, Klawock, Metlakatla, Pelican, Point Baker, Port Protection | Scenario 4: Earthquake in the Cascadia subduction zone along the British Columbia, Washington, Oregon and northern California shore(Geological Survey of Canada, K. Wang, written commun., 2010) | 2068 |
| RI 2020-2A | Hydaburg | Scenario 1: Multi-segment event based on the repeat of the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake, JDM(Johnson et al., 1996) | 2324 |
| RI 2020-2A | Hydaburg | Scenario 2: Multi-segment event: the Tohoku-type rupture of the PWS, KP and KI segments(hypothetical event) | 2325 |
| RI 2020-2A | Hydaburg | Scenario 3: The SAFRR tsunami scenario (SEM and SH segments)(Ross and others, 2013) | 2326 |
| RI 2020-2A | Hydaburg | Scenario 4: Earthquake in the Cascadia subduction zone along the British Columbia, Washington, Oregon and northern California shore(Geological Survey of Canada, K. Wang, written commun., 2010) | 2327 |
| RI 2021-6 | Akhiok, Chiniak, Old Harbor, Ouzinkie, and Port Lions | Scenario 1: Mw 9.2 earthquake in the area of Kodiak Island:10 km depth | 2343 |
| RI 2021-6 | Akhiok, Chiniak, Old Harbor, Ouzinkie, and Port Lions | Scenario 2: Mw 9.25 earthquake in the area of Kodiak Island: 20 km depth | 2344 |
| RI 2021-6 | Akhiok, Chiniak, Old Harbor, Ouzinkie, and Port Lions | Scenario 3: Mw 9.3 earthquake near Kodiak Island: 10-20 km depth, plus megathrust scenarios with splay faults | 2345 |
| RI 2021-6 | Akhiok, Chiniak, Old Harbor, Ouzinkie, and Port Lions | Scenario 4: Mw 9.25 earthquake in the area of Kodiak Island, 10 km depth, slip extending to 0 km depth | 2349 |
| RI 2021-6 | Akhiok, Chiniak, Old Harbor, Ouzinkie, and Port Lions | Scenario 5: Mw 9.3 earthquake in the area of Kodiak Island, 20 km depth, slip extending to 0 km depth | 2350 |
| RI 2021-6 | Akhiok, Chiniak, Old Harbor, Ouzinkie, and Port Lions | Scenario 6: Mw 9.3 earthquake near Kodiak Island: 10 depth, slip to 0km, plus sub-scenarios with splay faults | 2348 |
| RI 2021-6 | Akhiok, Chiniak, Old Harbor, Ouzinkie, and Port Lions | Scenario 7: Mw9.2 earthquake in the area of Kodiak Island with 44 m of maximum slip | 2346 |
| RI 2021-6 | Akhiok, Chiniak, Old Harbor, Ouzinkie, and Port Lions | Scenario 8: Mw 9.25 earthquake near Kodiak Island: 50m max slip, plus sub-scenarios with splay faults | 2347 |
| RI 2021-6 | Akhiok, Chiniak, Old Harbor, Ouzinkie, and Port Lions | Scenario 9: Earthquake in the Cascadia subduction zone along the British Columbia, Washington, Oregon and northern California shore(Geological Survey of Canada, K. Wang, written commun., 2010) | 2370 |
| RI 2022-2 | Akhiok, Chiniak, Karluk, Larsen Bay, Old Harbor, Ouzinkie, and Port Lions | Scenario 1: Mw 9.2 earthquake near Kodiak Island, 20 km depth | 2397 |
| RI 2022-2 | Akhiok, Chiniak, Karluk, Larsen Bay, Old Harbor, Ouzinkie, and Port Lions | Scenario 2: Mw 9.2 earthquake near Kodiak Island, 30 km depth | 2401 |
| RI 2022-2 | Akhiok, Chiniak, Karluk, Larsen Bay, Old Harbor, Ouzinkie, and Port Lions | Scenario 3: Mw 9.3 earthquake near Kodiak Island: 20-30 km depth | 2398 |
| RI 2022-2 | Akhiok, Chiniak, Karluk, Larsen Bay, Old Harbor, Ouzinkie, and Port Lions | Scenario 4: Mw 9.27 earthquake near Kodiak Island: 20-30 km depth, q=0.2 | 2399 |
| RI 2022-2 | Akhiok, Chiniak, Karluk, Larsen Bay, Old Harbor, Ouzinkie, and Port Lions | Scenario 5: Mw 9.18 earthquake near Kodiak Island: 20-30 km depth, q=0.7 | 2400 |
| RI 2022-2 | Akhiok, Chiniak, Karluk, Larsen Bay, Old Harbor, Ouzinkie, and Port Lions | Scenario 6: Mw 9.3 earthquake near Kodiak Island: 10 km depth, slip extending to 0 km depth | 2404 |
| RI 2022-2 | Akhiok, Chiniak, Karluk, Larsen Bay, Old Harbor, Ouzinkie, and Port Lions | Scenario 7: Mw9.2 earthquake in the area of Kodiak Island with 44 m of maximum slip | 2403 |
| RI 2022-2 | Akhiok, Chiniak, Karluk, Larsen Bay, Old Harbor, Ouzinkie, and Port Lions | Scenario 8: Mw9.25 earthquake in the area of Kodiak Island with 50 m of maximum slip | 2410 |
| RI 2022-2 | Akhiok, Chiniak, Karluk, Larsen Bay, Old Harbor, Ouzinkie, and Port Lions | Scenario 9: Earthquake in the Cascadia subduction zone along the British Columbia, Washington, Oregon and northern California shore(Geological Survey of Canada, K. Wang, written commun., 2010) | 2405 |
| RI 2022-3 | Seward, Resurrection Bay | Scenario 1: Mw9.2 earthquake in the PWS-KP-KI region: 10 km depth | 2467 |
| RI 2022-3 | Seward, Resurrection Bay | Scenario 2: Mw9.25 earthquake in the PWS-KP-KI region: 20 km depth, plus one sub-scenario with splay fault | 2468 |
| RI 2022-3 | Seward, Resurrection Bay | Scenario 3: Mw9.0 earthquake in the PWS-KP-KI region: 30 km depth | 2469 |
| RI 2022-3 | Seward, Resurrection Bay | Scenario 4: Mw9.3 earthquake in the PWS-KP-KI region: 20-30 km depth, plus one sub-scenario with splay fault | 2470 |
| RI 2022-3 | Seward, Resurrection Bay | Scenario 5: Mw9.3 earthquake in the PWS-KP-KI region: 15-20 km depth, q=0.2 | 2476 |
| RI 2022-3 | Seward, Resurrection Bay | Scenario 6: Mw9.25 earthquake in the PWS-KP-KI region: 25-30 km depth, q=0.7, plus sub-scenario of splay faults | 2475 |
| RI 2022-3 | Seward, Resurrection Bay | Scenario 7: Mw9.3 earthquake in the PWS-KP-KI region: 35m max slip across most of rupture, plus 3 sub-scenarios | 2529 |
| RI 2022-3 | Seward, Resurrection Bay | Scenario 8: Mw9.3 earthquake in the PWS-KP-KI region: 50m max slip close to the trench, plus one sub-scenario | 2466 |
| RI 2022-3 | Seward, Resurrection Bay | Scenario 9: Mw9.25 earthquake in the PWS-KP-KI region: 10 km depth, slip extending to 0 km depth | 2463 |
| RI 2022-3 | Seward, Resurrection Bay | Scenario 10: Mw9.0 earthquake in the PWS-KP-KI region: 50 m of maximum slip in the shallow part of the rupture | 2465 |
| RI 2022-3 | Seward, Resurrection Bay | Scenario 11: Earthquake in the Cascadia subduction zone along the British Columbia, Washington, Oregon and northern California shore(Geological Survey of Canada, K. Wang, written commun., 2010) | 2473 |
| RI 2023-2 | Anchorage, Upper Cook Inlet | Scenario 1: Mw9.2 earthquake in the KI-KP region: Predominantly shallow slip with maximum slip at depth 10-15 km | 2549 |
| RI 2023-2 | Anchorage, Upper Cook Inlet | Scenario 2: Mw9.2 earthquake in the KI-KP region: Predominantly shallow slip with maximum slip at depth 0-10 km | 2550 |
| RI 2023-2 | Anchorage, Upper Cook Inlet | Scenario 3: Mw8.7 earthquake in the KP region: maximum slip at a depth of 35-45 km | 2539 |
| RI 2023-2 | Anchorage, Upper Cook Inlet | Scenario 4: Mw8.8 earthquake in the KP region: maximum slip at a depth of 28-42 km | 2538 |
| RI 2023-2 | Anchorage, Upper Cook Inlet | Scenario 5: Mw8.8 earthquake in the KP region: maximum slip at a depth of 5-7 km | 2545 |
| RI 2023-2 | Anchorage, Upper Cook Inlet | Scenario 6: Mw9.0 earthquake in the PWS-KP-KI region: maximum slip at a depth of 28-42 km | 2548 |
| RI 2023-2 | Anchorage, Upper Cook Inlet | Scenario 7: Mw9.1 earthquake in the PWS-KP-KI region: maximum slip at a depth of 25-35 km | 2553 |
| RI 2023-2 | Anchorage, Upper Cook Inlet | Scenario 8: Mw9.1 earthquake in the PWS-KP-KI region: maximum slip at a depth of 18-32 km | 2552 |
| RI 2023-2 | Anchorage, Upper Cook Inlet | Scenario 9: Mw9.2 earthquake in the PWS-KP-KI region: maximum slip at a depth of 17-32 km | 2554 |
| RI 2023-2 | Anchorage, Upper Cook Inlet | Scenario 10: Mw9.1 earthquake in the PWS-KP-KI region: maximum slip at a depth of 20-40 km | 2555 |
| RI 2023-2 | Anchorage, Upper Cook Inlet | Scenario 11: Mw9.3 earthquake in the PWS-KP-KI region: 50 m of maximum slip close to the trench - LCI | 2528 |
| RI 2023-2 | Anchorage, Upper Cook Inlet | Scenario 12: Mw9.3 earthquake in the PWS-KP-KI region: 35 m of maximum slip across the majority of the rupture | 2529 |
| RI 2023-2 | Anchorage, Upper Cook Inlet | Scenario 13: The SAFRR tsunami scenario (SEM and SH segments)(Ross and others, 2013) | 2537 |
| RI 2023-2 | Anchorage, Upper Cook Inlet | Scenario 14: Mw8.9 earthquake in the KI-AP region: maximum slip at a depth of 15-25 km | 2533 |
| RI 2023-2 | Anchorage, Upper Cook Inlet | Scenario 15: Mw8.8 earthquake in the KI-AP region: maximum slip at a depth of 25-35 km | 2532 |
| RI 2023-2 | Anchorage, Upper Cook Inlet | Scenario 16: Earthquake in the Cascadia subduction zone along the British Columbia, Washington, Oregon and northern California shore(Geological Survey of Canada, K. Wang, written commun., 2010) | 2536 |
| RI 2024-4 | Lower Cook Inlet | Scenario 1: Mw9.2 earthquake in the KI-KP region: Predominantly shallow slip with maximum slip at depth 10-15 km | 2677 |
| RI 2024-4 | Lower Cook Inlet | Scenario 2: Mw9.2 earthquake in the KI-KP region: Predominantly shallow slip with maximum slip at depth 0-10 km | 2678 |
| RI 2024-4 | Lower Cook Inlet | Scenario 3: Mw9.1 earthquake in the PWS-KP-KI region: maximum slip at a depth of 18-32 km | 2664 |
| RI 2024-4 | Lower Cook Inlet | Scenario 4: Mw9.1 earthquake in the PWS-KP-KI region: maximum slip at a depth of 25-35 km | 2665 |
| RI 2024-4 | Lower Cook Inlet | Scenario 5: Mw9.0 earthquake in the PWS-KP-KI region: maximum slip at a depth of 28-42 km | 2666 |
| RI 2024-4 | Lower Cook Inlet | Scenario 6: Mw9.2 earthquake in the PWS-KP-KI region: maximum slip at a depth of 17-32 km | 2668 |
| RI 2024-4 | Lower Cook Inlet | Scenario 7: Mw9.1 earthquake in the PWS-KP-KI region: maximum slip at a depth of 20-40 km | 2683 |
| RI 2024-4 | Lower Cook Inlet | Scenario 8: Mw9.1 earthquake in the PWS-KP-KI region: maximum slip at a depth of 17-42 km | 2669 |
| RI 2024-4 | Lower Cook Inlet | Scenario 9: Mw8.8 earthquake in the PWS-KP-KI region: maximum slip at a depth of 32-38 km | 2679 |
| RI 2024-4 | Lower Cook Inlet | Scenario 10: Mw8.9 earthquake in the PWS-KP-KI region: maximum slip at a depth of 27-32 km | 2670 |
| RI 2024-4 | Lower Cook Inlet | Scenario 11: Mw8.9 earthquake in the KI-AP region: maximum slip at a depth of 15-25 km | 2672 |
| RI 2024-4 | Lower Cook Inlet | Scenario 12: Mw8.8 earthquake in the KI-AP region: maximum slip at a depth of 25-35 km | 2684 |
| RI 2024-4 | Lower Cook Inlet | Scenario 13: The SAFRR tsunami scenario (SEM and SH segments)(Ross and others, 2013) | 2674 |
| RI 2024-4 | Lower Cook Inlet | Scenario 14: Mw9.3 earthquake in the PWS-KP-KI region: 50 m of maximum slip close to the trench - LCI | 2675 |
| RI 2024-4 | Lower Cook Inlet | Scenario 15: Mw9.3 earthquake in the PWS-KP-KI region: 35 m of maximum slip across the majority of the rupture | 2687 |
| RI 2024-4 | Lower Cook Inlet | Scenario 16: Earthquake in the Cascadia subduction zone along the British Columbia, Washington, Oregon and northern California shore(Geological Survey of Canada, K. Wang, written commun., 2010) | 2671 |
| RI 2025-4 | False Pass | Scenario 1: Mw8.8 earthquake in the western Alaska Peninsula region with maximum slip at a depth of 15-35 km | 2657 |
| RI 2025-4 | False Pass | Scenario 2: Mw8.9 earthquake in the western Alaska Peninsula region with maximum slip at a depth of 15-45 km | 2659 |
| RI 2025-4 | False Pass | Scenario 3: Mw8.8 earthquake in the western Alaska Peninsula region with maximum slip at a depth of 25-45 km | 2661 |
| RI 2025-4 | False Pass | Scenario 4: Mw8.7 earthquake in the western Alaska Peninsula region with maximum slip at a depth of 35-55 km | 2663 |
| RI 2025-4 | False Pass | Scenario 5: Earthquake in western Alaska Peninsula region: Eastern asperity only | 2651 |
| RI 2025-4 | False Pass | Scenario 6: Earthquake in western Alaska Peninsula region: Eastern asperity and trench | 2649 |
| RI 2025-4 | False Pass | Scenario 7: Earthquake in western Alaska Peninsula region: Western asperity only | 2652 |
| RI 2025-4 | False Pass | Scenario 8: Earthquake in western Alaska Peninsula region: Western asperity and trench | 2648 |
| RI 2025-4 | False Pass | Scenario 9: Earthquake in western Alaska Peninsula region: Two asperities and trench | 2682 |
| RI 2025-4 | False Pass | Scenario 10: Earthquake in western Alaska Peninsula region: Two asperities, weakly connected | 2647 |
| RI 2025-4 | False Pass | Scenario 11: Mw9.0 earthquake in western Alaska Peninsula region: Predominantly shallow slip in the western part of the rupture | 2643 |
| RI 2025-4 | False Pass | Scenario 12: Mw9.1 earthquake in western Alaska Peninsula region: Predominantly shallow slip in the eastern part of the rupture | 2644 |
| RI 2025-4 | False Pass | Scenario 13: Mw8.8 earthquake in the western Alaska Peninsula region: Gap-filling event with shallow slip | 2655 |
| RI 2025-4 | False Pass | Scenario 14: Mw9.2 earthquake in the western Alaska Peninsula region | 2650 |
| RI 2025-4 | False Pass | Scenario 15: Mw9.3 earthquake in the western Alaska Peninsula region | 2642 |
| RI 2025-4 | False Pass | Scenario 16: Mw9.3 earthquake in the western Alaska Peninsula region: 50 m of maximum slip close to the trench | 2681 |
| RI 2025-4 | False Pass | Scenario 17: Mw9.3 earthquake in the western Alaska Peninsula region: 35 m of maximum slip across the majority of the rupture | 2686 |
| RI 2025-4 | False Pass | Scenario 18: Earthquake in the Cascadia subduction zone along the British Columbia, Washington, Oregon and northern California shore(Geological Survey of Canada, K. Wang, written commun., 2010) | 2680 |
